Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Xi’s tech clampdown signals end of a capitalist era With over $1 trillion in stock market losses tied to recent regulatory lurches, control is the new name of the game in China
asiatimes.com ^ | Sugust 3, 2021

Posted on 08/03/2021 8:24:28 AM PDT by elpadre

TOKYO – China is so keen to maintain control over its sprawling and expanding economy that it’s even willing to go communist.

For all the claims from Communist Party bigwigs that President Xi Jinping isn’t on an anti-wealth crusade, the losses are too jarring to dismiss as “capitalism doing its thing.”

Indeed, the more than US$1 trillion of market capitalization losses tied directly to Xi’s recent policies has China bulls mutating into China bears.

First, it was Jack Ma’s Ant Group getting stomped by Xi’s regulators. Then Didi Global and the $100 billion private tutoring sector got the boot. Next up is Tencent Holdings, China’s top social media and video game platform.

On Tuesday, state media derided online gaming as “spiritual opium,” clearly riffing off a famous Mao Zedong-ism.

That appears to answer investors’ questions about whether Xi’s crackdown on tech and tutoring companies will stop there. The emerging question is how much the blunt-force trauma inflicted by Xi’s regulators will cost China’s wider economy?

Jack Ma’s outspoken honesty in deriding Chinese regulators invoked a severe backlash that has left his future unclear.

A bridge too far?

Economist Scott Kennedy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies speaks for many when he worries that Beijing is going “too far” in ways that will damage growth in the short run and innovation in the long run. (continues at link)

(Excerpt) Read more at asiatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bannonswarroom; china; economy; losses; pensions; stockmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 08/03/2021 8:24:28 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Biden is ecstatic!
2 posted on 08/03/2021 8:28:07 AM PDT by immadashell (New Planned Parenthood slogan: Black Babies’ Lives Don't Matter!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

You mean!

You mean!

Xi isn’t out pulling turnips with his comrades at Turnip Commune #34?

What kind of communist is he?


3 posted on 08/03/2021 8:31:19 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Now if only we can keep capitalism in this country, while the CCP runs China into the ground.


4 posted on 08/03/2021 8:31:58 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

There’s room for only one superstar in Communist China.


5 posted on 08/03/2021 8:36:14 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Pei-Ping.


6 posted on 08/03/2021 8:36:22 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Why are both Kennedy (CSIS) and Roach, a lefty, worried about Red China’s economy slowing down re growth etc.? This would only help the Free World to tamp down Red China’s military and economic aggression, thus preventing armed conflicts and more economic/academic espionage.

At one time, CSIS was anti-communist with good level thinking about the issues. Now it sounds like this guy wants to protect the Communists. The same for Roach.

Can anyone explain why this is happening?


7 posted on 08/03/2021 8:38:09 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Xi's retirement in the next 5 years ought to be vellly interesting, as he is almost certain to have a Tiananmen moment staged by his internal competitors in the CCP, notably exercising what if Tiananmen wins this time around...
8 posted on 08/03/2021 8:40:10 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (All of you have one of the following in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is defeating himself”


9 posted on 08/03/2021 8:42:21 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (NUKE MECCA. ABOLISH THE DEA, IRS, AND ATF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Chinese securities are sinking from overregulation and control, not earnings related. It was always just a matter of time before this happened. Kept away from Chinese stocks for this reason.


10 posted on 08/03/2021 8:42:25 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (resist the narrative. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Commies gotta commie.


11 posted on 08/03/2021 8:48:59 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

This might save Xiden. If the PRC implodes on its own Xiden can take the credit.


12 posted on 08/03/2021 8:49:40 AM PDT by Fai Mao (I don't think we have enough telephone poles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

The article is long and interesting. It exposes what can be considered as economic policy weakness developed out of fear.

China has become too capitalist. The Chicaps are being destroyed to allow the Chicoms to exist.

Un mentioned are the many family businesses that are actually capitalist entities that interact with the Overseas China economic and trade on a global scale.

The people may not tolerate Xi and the CCP. He then has a very serious problem. That day is coming


13 posted on 08/03/2021 8:50:58 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Like BLM, Joe Biden is a Domestic Enemy )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Could it adversely affect the Biden Criminal Syndicate in any way???


14 posted on 08/03/2021 8:51:54 AM PDT by elpadre ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

“Could it adversely affect the Biden Criminal Syndicate in any way???”

Less money to skim from and under the table payouts? But, less chance he will be blackmailed too I’d think.


15 posted on 08/03/2021 8:55:22 AM PDT by Fai Mao (I don't think we have enough telephone poles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
$1 trillion in stock market losses tied to recent regulatory lurches,

That's going to translate into a lot of shuttered factories unless they get nationalized even further. Which will in turn result in even bigger market losses (cuz' a trillion loss ust isn't enough).

Jobless chinese having moved from the country commune to an urban job, will no longer have those jobs. People with nothing to lose might as well rise up and kill Xi. Long past due.

16 posted on 08/03/2021 8:57:45 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

We recently had a very high Google “AI scientist” marry into the family. I was talking to him about how someday AI could get ahead of us and take over control of things. He told me they were excited about how well things were going only a year ago. They thought they were doing the right thing in letting the “cross over” happen on turning AI loose and striking out on it’s own. He is now very concerned and even seemed afraid about what has happed in the last couple of months. He said something “unexpected” had taken place. He would not go further into it but it was beyond AI being able to strike out on it’s own. I pushed him for an explanation and he only would say “I’m very concerned about what is going to be happening in the next three months” in my response to taking to him about the momentum of the speed of digital doubling, tripling, quadrupling. He said the concern was outside of that issue? He shut right up after that. I wonder what in the hell is going on? If he knew something I wish he would tell us. He even had tears in his eyes while mentioning this grave concern they have. Could it be something about our economy collapsing? Or maybe AI taking over people’s personal or medical affairs? Something about what is going to happen to people is what I was picking up from him.


17 posted on 08/03/2021 9:10:40 AM PDT by Rainwave ("Work out your OWN salvation with fear and trembling")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

What makes you think he plans to retire? Just a couple years ago he removed term limits from the presidency. Presumably he did this for a reason. President for Life. Consolidating control now so there will be no serious opposition when the time comes.


18 posted on 08/03/2021 9:14:31 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (resist the narrative. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

To the CCP Capitalism was just a means to an end.

During Mao’s time, it was all about breaking China’s dependency on foreigners. Once that was accomplished, they would open themselves up to the world with the intention of trapping them. Get them to produce all their goods in China, use cheap Chinese labor, while China accumulates wealth, that they turn around and invest in Western Corporations and gain leverage.

The day would inevitably come when they would pull out and create global chaos.


19 posted on 08/03/2021 9:17:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

“China is so keen to maintain control over its sprawling and expanding economy that it’s even willing to go communist ... worries that Beijing is going “too far” in ways that will damage growth in the short run and innovation in the long run.”

Very misleading article. The CCP under dictator and Chairman Xi Jinping MUST control its economy because the CCP is a paranoid fragile psychotic entity consisting of many of the Old Guard Revolutionaries held together by transplants and other medical devices. All threats must be controlled or treated as an enemy and eliminated.

What are those threats? Wealth, role model, personal inspiration, influence, leadership, popularity of non-leadership non-CCP members. The CCP must ALWAYS be the winner, the leader, the most popular, the most influential, the wealthiest, the role model for the people. Otherwise, some might become more powerful than the CCP, more popular, wealthy, inspiring the people to become like them and overthrown the rein of the CCP.

This is Maoism in the 21st Century. Traditional China was utterly destroyed by Mao. The people learned to keep their heads down and follow their leader of face death. For thousands of years the Chinese people were very inventive and creative (http://factsanddetails.com/china/cat2/4sub7/item30.html), but that inventiveness and creativity was destroyed by the Great Leap Backward.

Ma never spoke out against the Party - a western press myth, he only hinted that there could be a better way to do some things; but that was not his ‘crime’. He was too wealthy, too influential, too inspiring. He was forced, like others before him, to turn over his $43 billion dollar fortune by selling all of his 3 million odd shares he owned of his creation, Alibaba to the CCP. Jack Ma is someones’ spare organs.

After Deng Xiaoping pulled back the darkness of Mao’s revolution in 1986, limited capitalism flourished - China became a grey zone, rather than a black zone; he was followed by Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. But Xi Jinping (President of the PRC, Chair of the Central Military Commission of the PRC) has returned to the absolute one-man rule of Mao.

Remnant capitalism is being crushed in the return to the black zone of Mao Zedong. Innovation is not being crushed, its being eliminated; growth is whatever the CCP claims. Both innovation and growth were mainly products of Hong Kong - the virus that was infecting the Mainland is gone now. Western investors, in any Chinese corporation, now directly support the CCP and Xi’s iron-fisted rule. Investing in China now is like investing in the old Soviet Union under Stalin. Its really not about communism so much, but about one man’s absolute control of the people, who, for the most part, hate him and what he stands for.


20 posted on 08/03/2021 9:21:34 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson