1 posted on
07/28/2021 8:59:11 PM PDT by
aimhigh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: aimhigh
Deep pockets always gets nailed.....
2 posted on
07/28/2021 9:02:33 PM PDT by
Hambone 1934
(Dems love playing Nazis.....The republicans love helping them)
To: aimhigh
As police closed in on the school, he killed himself.A fine piece of journalism.
3 posted on
07/28/2021 9:05:01 PM PDT by
gundog
(It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: aimhigh
I guess they found the gun guilty?
4 posted on
07/28/2021 9:05:16 PM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(In politicians we get what we deserve, usually the best that money can buy, guaranteed.)
To: aimhigh; null and void; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; Black Agnes; blueyon; ...
6 posted on
07/28/2021 9:06:47 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: aimhigh
Why the hell would they do that?
7 posted on
07/28/2021 9:07:46 PM PDT by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: All
No wonder they went bankrupt and dissolved, with people this stupid running the place.
Not to mention the bad precedent it sets, ESPECIALLY when biden (harris) [0bama] is in the process of letting arms manufacturers to be sued by anyone who gets shot at.
To: aimhigh
All because some spoiled dweeb who should have been institutionalized had mommy issues. Close down the mental asylums, and this is what you get.
11 posted on
07/28/2021 9:18:09 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
("Success is 10 percent inspiration and 90 percent perspiration." — Thomas Edison)
To: aimhigh
Why not sue the fidiot dead mom’s estate and the shrinks and doctors of the pathetic little sh*t asperger-tard? If the POS slammed a car into a yard full of children, would the manufacturer of the vehicle be sued?
12 posted on
07/28/2021 9:22:42 PM PDT by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: aimhigh
Is Remington setting a precedent that could/will help the left initiate lawsuits on manufacturers of guns used in crime? I think this is a bad move on their part.
13 posted on
07/28/2021 9:24:17 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees)
To: aimhigh
They’re in bankruptcy. Whatever the settlement is, they likely won’t have to pay it once their debt is disolved.
14 posted on
07/28/2021 9:24:58 PM PDT by
GeorgianaCavendish
(Man shall not serve two masters, for he will love one and hate the other.)
To: aimhigh
why? They didn’t kill anyone.
17 posted on
07/28/2021 9:33:15 PM PDT by
Karliner
(Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
To: aimhigh
They capitulated. I’ll never buy one of their products ever again.
20 posted on
07/28/2021 9:46:39 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
To: aimhigh
It’s like Remmington pulled the trigger. What a joke. I have no sympathy for the families who brought this suit. Greed does not make a lose go away.
22 posted on
07/28/2021 9:59:29 PM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” ― Thomas Jefferson)
To: aimhigh
The old Remington no longer exists. It already was broken up and the pieces sold off. The firearms division is now owned by Roundhill Arms which AFAIK is not yet manufacturing any Remington-branded firearms. The gun used at Sandy Hoax was a Bushmaster, and Bushmaster now is owned by Franklin Armory and already is back in production ... as Bushmaster.
Published on their FacistBook page in late February:
So what the idiot who wrote the story failed to mention (and what we still don't know) is who is paying this $33 mil.
To: aimhigh
This is ridiculous.
Why not sue Ford, for OJ’s Bronco chase ?
26 posted on
07/28/2021 10:41:58 PM PDT by
Reverend Wright
( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
To: aimhigh
One of the reasons for the ammunition famine was that Remington's ammo division had shut down because of the bankruptcy proceedings. But they resumed production
on the 13th of April, albeit under the ownership of Vista Outdoors.
To: aimhigh
The proposed settlement for the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre from Remington, America's oldest gun-maker, came as part of a bankruptcy hearing for the company. If I were a holder of Remington debt I would contest this settlement.
The likelihood of the Sandy Hook families succeeding in their suit is minimal.
The only reason that Remington wants to settle is to expedite the completion of the bankruptcy.
29 posted on
07/28/2021 11:00:07 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: aimhigh
He stole the rifle from his mother, after killing her.
Where does Remington's liability come from?
To: aimhigh
This is a horrible precedent.
Remminton is at best getting bad legal advice.
Frivolous lawsuits should be fought until the litigants are dead, along with three generations of descendants.
Even if that costs more on one lawsuit, it discourages the next generation of parasites from bothering.
31 posted on
07/29/2021 2:43:10 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(America is no longer in Claire Wolfe's "awkward stage")
To: aimhigh
This is a dreadful precedent.
It will only open a Pandora’s Box.
32 posted on
07/29/2021 3:00:40 AM PDT by
Daffynition
(*Mega Dittoes and Mega Prayers* & :))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson