Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rise of the Moors’ member Quinn Cumberlander rejects authority of Malden court, declines interview with lawyer on firearms charges after I-95 standoff
Mass Live ^ | 7/6/2021 | Mass Live

Posted on 07/06/2021 11:22:56 AM PDT by Vermont Lt

Amid a heavy state police presence, the first “Rise of the Moors” member appearing Tuesday in Malden District Court on several firearms charges after a highway standoff in Wakefield repeatedly objected to a judge’s basic questions, declined to be interviewed by a public defender and insisted he had the “right to bear arms.”

(Excerpt) Read more at masslive.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; ma; militia; moors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
The first of the Rise of the Moors defendents are appearing before judges.

I have it on reasonably good authority that these clowns were heard racking rounds into chambers are the Trooper approached and that they have been on the FBI internal Terrorist Watch newtwork. The FBI has been controlling most of the information released, as the has to do with interstate firearms and terrorist investigations. The traveled from RI, through MA, to ME...on ME plates that do not appear to match the vehcile.

We shall see....

1 posted on 07/06/2021 11:22:56 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Darn white supremacists! /s


2 posted on 07/06/2021 11:24:53 AM PDT by brownsfan (Term limits! Without term limits, we are doomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

This “Moors” thing has been around for a while. It exists to show that Sovereign Citizen lunacy isn’t just for white people.


3 posted on 07/06/2021 11:26:01 AM PDT by cdcdawg (It's all so tiresome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

These are the white suprtemist guys the media showed with Confederate flags, right? You know, the dreaded white supremists all the DC people have been wraning us about.


4 posted on 07/06/2021 11:26:28 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Some tips for those moving your well armed “troops” through enemy territory...

Just for those wondering why the Trooper pulled before seeing “anything” suspicious....the Troopers are obligated (it is one of their defined jobs) to assist drivers who have pulled off the interstate and who have their flashers on.

The trooper would have pulled over if it was ANY two cars with their flashers on.

What they were wearing, had nothing to do with it.

When the plates came back not matching the vehicle...it sent MASSIVE red flags.


5 posted on 07/06/2021 11:27:06 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

objected to a judge’s basic questions

Always thought people talked to much to court folks. Saw a show one time the DA was going to interview a guy the DA says, Well shall we get started and the perp said, Do I have to answer that?


6 posted on 07/06/2021 11:28:07 AM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I think there’s a typo in the headline.


7 posted on 07/06/2021 11:30:05 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

And...driving around with loaded long arms in your car is against the law in MA. It must be unloaded and in a locked container (this is mostly to prevent shooting deer from your car.) Of course you must have an FID card.

Driving with a loaded pistol is not—as long as it is under your control (pretty much meaning holstered). Again, you must be permitted appropriately.

Finally, there is no “obligation” in MA to inform the police that you are carrying a firearm on your body or in your vehicle. So...traveling through the state to ME with firearms in your trunk is probably not going to be discovered if you are not a complete moron.


8 posted on 07/06/2021 11:31:57 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“FBI internal Terrorist Watch newtwork”

So we’re trusting the FBI today?


9 posted on 07/06/2021 11:32:19 AM PDT by dljordan (Slouching towards Woketopia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

My neice (not my source for information on this case) is a public defender. She has defended sovereign citizens before.

They generally are polite to the judge. But they almost never get bail. And after a week in gen pop in the county lock up...they tend to come around to our rules.

But their hearings are usually short and abrupt. Everyone—the prosecutor, the defender, and the cour staff—usually have a good chuckle as the moop is led away.


10 posted on 07/06/2021 11:35:50 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Evidently the State Police teams are listening to them. My guess is that this will go down as one of those “beat cop stumbles” onto the FBI investigation things.

Honestly, I imagine the State Cops who deal with these things are laughing...just a little. They work “with” Federal groups. But the Feds often are very slow to do anything. It seems there is always a bigger fish...whom they never catch.

My guess is that black internal terrorist don’t really fit the current narrative. Oops.


11 posted on 07/06/2021 11:39:18 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

I wonder which of these moops is the FBI informer. Probably the guy who is yelling the loudest.


12 posted on 07/06/2021 11:41:12 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

Define Sovereign Citizen.


13 posted on 07/06/2021 11:41:26 AM PDT by Arcadian Empire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

It’s really a set of beliefs, usually centered around the idea that an individual can opt out of the legal system in favor of an alternative system. At a basic level, it’s generally someone who thinks their consent to be bound by a law determines if the law applies to them.


14 posted on 07/06/2021 11:47:42 AM PDT by cdcdawg (It's all so tiresome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

Are there any Freepers who are Sovereign Citizens?


15 posted on 07/06/2021 11:52:27 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

If you can change your “gender” just by declaring it, why not pretend you are under no laws and you can do anything you want and declare that you are your own country, or you are emperor of the Andromeda Galaxy Empire, or whatever. The left tells us you can be anything (except you can’t be a white, straight Christian).


16 posted on 07/06/2021 12:06:53 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
"FBI internal Terrorist Watch network."

I suspect all conservative Trump supporters are on the same list.

17 posted on 07/06/2021 12:09:08 PM PDT by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I used to commute on 128, (what locals call that stretch of I-95) not through Wakefield*, but near it, and do not recall ever seeing a state trooper on patrol. Damned near unpoliced, unless they are driving in unmarked cars. Something might have triggered the Staties interest.

*My wife and I had our first date in Wakefield in 1981.


18 posted on 07/06/2021 12:17:08 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Diana Moon Glampers for Secretary of Education! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

They can be hilarious, true, but some of these folks are seriously unhinged and are downright dangerous.

These guys look to be in the “dangerous” category, or moving in that direction.


19 posted on 07/06/2021 12:17:30 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

Because none of the Left’s stuff is based on neutral principles. It is all based on a predetermined outcome. That’s why bringing up Robert Byrd never mattered. “Racism” means “white people are evil.” It’s the Left’s term, they invented the entire concept as a weapon against what used to be a white and Christian establishment. Most GOP voters are white. So, for example, “the Democrats are the real racists” doesn’t even phase them.


20 posted on 07/06/2021 12:17:49 PM PDT by cdcdawg (It's all so tiresome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson