#25. If Winston fired a handgun from inside his car out the back window, including points you raise, they police forensic team should be able to address the following questions:
1. Did the suspect fire a gun at all? Gun powder residue should be on his hands, face, clothing, car seat, back seat and possibly the rear window.
2. Was there a hole in the back window and if so, does it show that the bullet came from within the car (the glass would be blown out as indicated by the details of the entry/exit hole/size/impact direction, etc.
3. Was there a gun recovered inside the car or just outside of it? If so, where and was there a fingerprint/s on it? If so, whose print(s) were they?
4. Was there a bullet casing recovered inside or just outside of the car (and if so, did it have a fingerprint on it?
5. Was there a smell of gunpowder inside the car after the police opened its doors?
6. Any cam films, tapes, esp. of the gun shot from within the car, available, etc?
7. Has the girl been offered a lie-detector test? If so, did she accept or reject? If she rejected it, was it her idea or that of someone else, including Winston’s/or her attorneys?
IF she took one, what were the results or are they going to be revealed to a grand jury or trial jury/judge?
8. How about a Voice Stress Analysis test? Same questions.
9. Were there any police or other eyewitnesses to any shots being fired from within the car, the shattering of the rear window, smoke coming out of the car from the shot, or did anyone (if they were close enough) hear a shot from the suspect?
10. Has the girl been warned what the penalty for lying to the police during an investigation is, as well as lying under oath before a grand jury or in a court hearing/trial?
11. Given Crumps record of unethical practices, has anyone moved to have him disqualified as a lawyer for the suspect’s/girlfriend’s family/s?
Ya I would say do so more reading before taking sides. Maybe read my post number 32. In a nutshell the state investigative unit has a gun and shell casings recovered from the vehicle but can’t say if the gun had been fired during the incident. Then we have the witness that is saying she never saw a gun on the suspect or in the car and she was in the car with him. Put those two things together and something is beginning to smell bad. Why would this guy have a gun in the car with shell casings fired from that gun when it had not been fired from the car? At the same time girl says she never saw a gun? If the state investigators are publicly stating they are not sure the gun had been fired then they know something doesn’t look right and they are covering themselves.
Crap I meant that post to go to wardaddy.