BOMBSHELL: Maricopa County Election Audit Uncovers 'Significant Discrepancies'

Earlier this month, the team auditing the 2020 presidential election in Maricopa County, Ariz., reported that the county was refusing to turn over routers or even images of routers to election auditors despite a judge’s order. Why would they refuse? The county claimed that they “determined the information contained in Maricopa County’s routers can be used as blueprints to intercept sensitive county data.”

But maybe there’s another explanation?

The team handling the audit has made a couple of shocking announcements recently that suggest something truly is amiss with the election results in Maricopa County.

“As we open boxes of ballots delivered by Maricopa County, we are discovering significant discrepancies between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes,” reports the official Twitter account of the Maricopa County 2020 Election Audit.

Breaking Update: As we open boxes of ballots delivered by Maricopa County, we are discovering significant discrepancies between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes.
— Maricopa Arizona Audit (@ArizonaAudit) May 13, 2021

This comes on the heels of another astonishing discovery made on Wednesday when the audit team discovered that “Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit.”

“This is spoliation of evidence!” they say.

Breaking Update: Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence! pic.twitter.com/mY0fmmFXAm
— Maricopa Arizona Audit (@ArizonaAudit) May 13, 2021

significant discrepancies between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes

To be honest I couldn't sit through all of Lindell's videos but I did see much of one of his shorter videos, where he had a statistics professor explain the theory that the voting machines would insert votes, based on the registration and census data, for those people who did not show up to vote.

In other words, say only 60% of registered voters actually vote. That leaves 40% headroom you can just insert into the database and claim they did vote. Unless you hand count the ballots, you'd never know.

You almost have it.

The problems is that hand counting of ballots won’t get it. They pre-printed ballots and delivered them to match the people who they voted for. That’s why you have late ballots, brought it in the middle of the night, or someone giving keys and access for ballot rooms to Democratic operatives. They had to survive a recount so they could say the Republicans were sore loosers, and there was no problem.

The issue is that we have 3 sites of forensic audit so far in the entire US. Maricopa County, AZ, Wyndam NH, and Antrim MI. All of these sites have identified problems with the vote machines. Antrim had database program that shouldn’t have been on it for vote flipping. Wyndam machines gave incorrect tallies, and Maricopa county.......well we don’t really know all the shenanigans there yet.

Strickly speaking from an American, supporter of voter rights, we need every county to undergo a forensic audit at this point. No one should believe that the system is intact until this happens.

I get all that, and it is my understanding is that one of the matters under audit is the ballots themselves, example, is there a stack of 500 sequential ballots all marked with the same ink and all for the same candidate(s)? While not totally outside the realm of possibility, statistically very unlikely. And, is there another sequence of ballots that mirrors the first? And a third? The more of that appears, the likelihood of legitimacy reduces to the realm of statistical impossibility. More than 500 ballots in a sequence? Even more so.

The more you cheat, the more ways you are likely to be found out.

oooh - ‘discrepancies’!

SO, eventually they’ll make some elections officials resign, and replace them with the next set of corrupt election officials, with a dusting of the hands and a hearty “Job well done!”

Nothing will change. Unless some seriously connected officials are frog-marched to the penitentiary.

There is absolutely no reason private companies should be involved in the elections. Not even the printing of ballots. It should all be agents of the citizens who are accountable to the laws and to the people, subject to rights and privileges of a free people such as FOIA transparency; and where those agents can be held accountable and not hide behind threats of multi-billion dollar lawsuits, which is preposterous on its face.

Speaking back to you as an American supporter of voter rights, let’s not pretend that elections haven’t ALWAYS come with an unhealthy doses of, well, shenanigans. To pretend otherwise is just silly. There is no reason to believe it doesn’t still occur. Methods may change, the purposes don’t.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.