Posted on 05/07/2021 6:21:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
The New York Times reports that "Pfizer Reaps Hundreds of Millions in Profits From Covid Vaccine." The pharma giant Pfizer earned revenues of $3.5 billion in the first three months of 2021, estimated to generate around $900 billion in profits. All the company had to do was create a safe drug that effectively alleviated the threat of the most deadly virus we've faced in over a century -- one responsible for hundreds of thousands of American deaths and a cost of trillions in economic damage -- and then manufacture and dispense hundreds of millions of doses in the shortest span of any vaccine ever created.
"Unlike several vaccine manufacturers that vowed to forego profits during the Covid-19 pandemic, Pfizer planned to profit," explained former secretary of labor Robert Reich to his 1.3 million followers. "Today it announced that the vaccine brought in $3.5 billion in the first three months of 2021, nearly a quarter of its total revenue."
Good for Pfizer.
Why should Pfizer forgo profits that were netted using their time, talents, efforts and experience? Does Reich forego his $300,000 a year teaching anti-capitalist bunkum to impressionable young minds? Progressives -- and increasing numbers of conservatives angered by social media partisanship and industry wokeness -- have made "corporations" an amorphous enemy. There is plenty to grouse about, but Big Pharma saves more lives every year than all government programs combined.
Setting aside COVID for a moment, their innovations have transformed numerous once-deadly ailments into nothing but historical footnotes. They help millions of Americans who suffer from debilitating depression and pain live more bearable lives. Pharma does it for money. Just like you do what you do for money.
Of course, if profits were predicated on a meritocracy of useful goods and services, Berkeley would sue Robert Reich for millions. And yet, it's his outlook that seems to be winning in Washington.
On Senator Bernie Sanders and other liberal Democrats have been urging President Joe Biden to support a COVID vaccine intellectual-property waiver, arguing, according to Reuters, that "it would help save lives and prioritize people over drug company profits." And this week, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai announced that the Biden administration is going to negotiate with the World Trade Organization for ways to coerce companies to undo those protections.
First of all, the entire notion of having to choose between people and profits, a belief that undergirds much of leftist economics, is debunked by the existence of the COVID vaccine. Big profits and big humanitarian efforts coexist. "I want to create something to help humanity" and "I want a boatload of cash for doing it" are perfectly compatible positions -- and the latter is often necessary to make the former a reality. I hope everyone who helped save your frail grandfather or your immunocompromised family member from a premature death gets filthy rich.
Secondly, waiving intellectual property rights ex post facto is flat-out state-sponsored theft. Normalizing such an action by the government would be disastrous. Why would pharma companies pump billions into research and development if the government starts changing the terms after the job is done? Who is going to do the job if they don't? The CDC?
Without strong protections of intellectual property, companies won't make enormous investments of capital in the development of new drugs -- the average cost of which is nearly $3 billion. American companies are given a 20-year monopoly on the idea. Even in Europe, the disconnect between the marketplace and the cost of pharmaceuticals undermines innovation and disincentivizes technological advances and access.
Of all the cancer drugs that were brought to the market between 2011 and 2018, for instance, 95% were available in the United States, while only 74% were available in the U.K. -- Europe's top-performing nation -- and only 8% in Greece -- its worst. While 90% of new anti-viral drugs are available in the United States, only 60% of these new drugs are available in Britain. While 91% of new cardiovascular drugs are available in the United States, only 73% of these therapies are available in Britain. And so on.
There are numerous complicated reasons for why some nations prosper enough to devise and mass-produce effective vaccines in a mere six months, while others probably couldn't do it in six years, or even 60. One reason is that some nations embrace competitive free markets and strong property rights and others do not. We can find ways to help others without corroding the ideas that allowed us to succeed.
Ha! It’s what communists do.
I’d be willing to bet that the majority of big Pharma executives voted Biden. As such, I’ll have a cup of schadenfreude please.
Bookmark
I can remember a time when conservatives applauded people who accumulated wealth through smart business moves and companies that performed well by providing products in demand. Profits and accumulation of wealth were seen as measures of success. Getting there was something to aspire to through hard work and being smarter than the next guy.
More recently, I see a lot of the “We are the 99%” style rhetoric even here. Lots of “Eat the rich!” Anyone with money is demonized. Any company making money is evil and must be destroyed. Money bad. Success bad.
Seems backwards and wrong to my old brain. Don’t know how you encourage people to work hard while teaching them they’re to be punished if that hard work pays off.
What people don’t think much about is the testing that normally is required by FDA to get anything on the market. It’s not uncommon for a new drug to require years of testing before marketing. Typically only 1 out of 10 makes it to market. The CV-19 vaccine was rushed through this time. The profits from this drug will fund the development of other drugs. If people want to bitch about pharma profits, where would you be if there was no drug production or R&D in this country?
I could care less if they profit. What I would like to see is someone being held accountable for any damage done by a “vaccine”.
As it stands, the EUA covers the CDC’s butt and the “vaccine” makers have immunity. What happens if we find out in a year or three that these newfangled injections are wreaking havoc on people’s systems?
And look how many fully tested drugs are later taken OFF the market. Followed shortly after by the appearance of law firm commercials. Have you or a loved one suffered blindness and the growth of a 3rd arm after taking [insert FDA approved drug here]?
Blackrock was put in charge of managing all the covid triggered bond buying and bailouts, they control $6.5 trillion in assets, and under ESG, if you’re not woke, no money for you. Good ole American capitalism is being destroyed with Fed backed debt instruments run by a private corporation, no issue here with some pushback against this.
Not to forget, there are plenty of cheap drugs to treat Covid, which have basically been banned. That tells you all you need to know.
Let me help you out...
We aren’t against hard work and making money. We are against corporate power that uses the government to rig the game against the American worker. That creates rules and regulations that favor those that are connected, and punish smaller competitors trying to work hard to get ahead.
In short, we are under a type of corporate fascism at present, which isn’t about hard work and legitimate accumulation of wealth. It is about using the levers of global governments to centralize power and wealth.
The virus that has a 99.97% recovery rate for people under 50 with no serious preexisting health problems is the most deadly? The “most deadly virus” is one that most people have to be tested for to find out if they even have it and most “new cases” are the result of people being forced to have a test for travel, work or hospital admittance for an unrelated problem?
In the flu pandemic of 1918-1920 that the scare mongers are always attempting to compare this to... a third of the world's population became infected with young healthy people dying in huge numbers many within a day or two of being exposed.
ping
What I want to know is how they generate a profit of $900 billion from revenues of $3.5 billion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.