Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prince of Space

The ‘watermark’ is a fable. That claim was made early on during the ‘we caught them’ stage prior to any real investigations. It was claimed that all the ‘authentic’ ballots had a watermark and that it will be easy to determine the ‘fake’ ballots. Turns out, no such watermark exists. I’ll just have to take your word for the other assertions.


20 posted on 05/01/2021 8:36:02 AM PDT by LibertyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyWoman

For example, a good source would be someone actually performing one of those tasks at the audit.

How come no one is asking them? Is what they’re doing secret? And if it is, why?

For example, the watermark issue. Do the ballots have such a watermark? (Source?) Are there people checking watermarks? (Source?) Can’t someone checking watermarks declare they are doing that task? Why not?

If we’re looking for a transparent vote, it seems that we ought to be entitled to a transparent audit process.


23 posted on 05/01/2021 8:41:26 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyWoman

Sorry, I thought I was replying to Prince of Spades. I didn’t realize you’d gotten a comment in after his.


24 posted on 05/01/2021 8:43:10 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson