Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court tosses out another Republican 2020 election challenge
CNN ^ | 04/19/2021 | Ariane de Vogue and Rachel Janfaza

Posted on 04/19/2021 7:21:54 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Five months after the presidential election, the Supreme Court said on Monday that it won't take up a case from several Republicans challenging changes to election rules in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.

The unsigned ruling sends yet another message that the court's majority has no interest in relitigating the last election. Before Monday, the justices had already declined several requests to dive into one of the most litigious elections in history, denying petitions from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans seeking to overturn election result in multiple states President Joe Biden won.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arianedevogue; butbutkraken; electionfraud; iiberalarianedevogue; paping; pennsylvania; racheljanfaza; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2021 7:21:54 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Roberts is bought and paid for.....................


2 posted on 04/19/2021 7:23:03 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
The Supreme Court has ruled that de facto election fraud is legal in the USA.
3 posted on 04/19/2021 7:23:13 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("A nation of sheep will be controlled by wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Ping.


4 posted on 04/19/2021 7:23:34 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Why would the virtuous whores take a case? Then they would have to see the evidence and make a ruling.


5 posted on 04/19/2021 7:23:37 AM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

What are the steps in removing a compromised Supreme Court Justice?


6 posted on 04/19/2021 7:26:11 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Who needs to pack the court?


7 posted on 04/19/2021 7:26:16 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Discovery is dangerous.

...to the ruling class.

8 posted on 04/19/2021 7:26:56 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Please Pray For My Brother Ken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

One kick in the teeth already this fine Monday.


9 posted on 04/19/2021 7:28:14 AM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

It is troubling that the Supreme Court won’t even hear these cases.

When the liberal talking point is spewed by the talking heads on TV, that there was no fraud in the election, what is left unsaid is that there have not been any real investigations into voter fraud. Cases have been summarily dismissed, as this one was, without the courts even considering the evidence.

And to the liberals, not looking into something is the same as saying that any concerns of fraud are false.


10 posted on 04/19/2021 7:28:15 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

The only silver lining possible is that they turnaround and refus to hear demonratic challenges to redistricting challenges.


11 posted on 04/19/2021 7:28:43 AM PDT by Fai Mao (It is time, past time and almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

I think impeachment is the only way a Supreme Court justice can be removed.


12 posted on 04/19/2021 7:29:15 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Our beloved US Supine Court doesn’t rule again...


13 posted on 04/19/2021 7:29:29 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I think the threat of court packing is doing it’s intended job.
Of course the result is putting the SCOTUS seal of approval on election fraud.


14 posted on 04/19/2021 7:31:20 AM PDT by NEPA (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

...”the court’s majority has no interest in relitigating the last election.”

Don’t you have to Litigate before you Relitigate ?


15 posted on 04/19/2021 7:32:57 AM PDT by PMAS (Vote with your wallets, there are 80 million of us - No Amazon, No Chy-Na made )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

No remedy is possible


16 posted on 04/19/2021 7:33:08 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
What's to discuss....the USSC KNOWS DARN WELL Biden is s-o-o-o-o popular.....81 million people voted for him (/s).

==============================

BTW, how many invites has "Mr Popularity" received from our allies? They must be dying to meet such a popular person as Joe Biden, who is obviously adored by Americans.

REALITY CHECK The number of State visits (per country) President Trump was invited to:

One: Afghanistan, Argentina, Canada, China, Finland, India, Iraq, Israel, North Korea, Philippines, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Vatican City and the disputed West Bank

Two: Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, South Korea, Switzerland and Vietnam

Three: Japan and the United Kingdom

Four: France

The number of state visits to which Biden has been invited:

ZERO

17 posted on 04/19/2021 7:33:36 AM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/nation-world/story/2021-04-19/supreme-court-rejects-lingering-2020-election-challenge-case

This article as more information:

“The justices had in February, after President Joe Biden’s inauguration, rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election. In the case the court rejected Monday, however, the court had called for additional briefing that was not complete until the end of March.

“The case involved a federal court challenge to a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision requiring election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots that arrived up to three days after the election. More broadly, however, the case concerned whether state lawmakers or state courts get the last word about the manner in which federal elections are carried out.”


18 posted on 04/19/2021 7:33:38 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Little more could make me dance the jig of joy then to have SCOTUS step in and stop on these states that have violated their own laws and constitutions.

The rest of me steps back and believes this is a states issue the states need to solve, even though it does affect the outcome of a federal election affecting the entire country. Hate it but it’s true.

The states need to solve this responsibility the US Constitution issued to them, giving each state the voting process on to their shoulders.


19 posted on 04/19/2021 7:34:24 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Who was the majority deciding this , and what was the challenge ?

We know Robert’s the weasel sides with Dems so who of the new appointees joined the cabal to get to 5-4 and on what basis.


20 posted on 04/19/2021 7:34:50 AM PDT by patriotspride (Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson