Posted on 04/01/2021 8:23:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
Plato treated laughter as something to be avoided at all costs; he considered it to be an emotion capable of nullifying one’s self-control.
The philosopher, one assumes, would very much approve of SNL, especially the latest episode, where a particularly unfunny segment stood out. It involved Bowen Yang, an Asian American comedian, and Colin Jost, a regular on the show since 2005. Yang was there to discuss the recent wave of anti-Asian hate crimes across the nation. He begins by saying the following: “things for Asian in this country have been bleak for the last two weeks…..and before that, forever.” This is a highly disingenuous point, unreflective of reality. Nevertheless, it goes unchallenged.
Then again, what could Colin Jost, who seems like an affable individual, really do? He is a “privileged,” white male, the very type of person Yang is there to castigate. Jost looks confused and more than a little afraid. The segment is highly reminiscent of Jimmy Kimmel’s self-flagellation at the most recent Emmys.
Jost asks what we – as in, white people - can do to help Asians in America. Yang responds, imploring white parents to feed their children “chicken feet.” One wonders how the consumption of chicken feet will help fight discrimination.
Yang continues, telling viewers that he can’t discuss the hatred shown towards Asians without discussing “class,” “gender,” and “imperialism.”
Really? Because SNL is the perfect outlet to discuss imperialism. Is this what the average viewer is tuning in for, to be lectured on the dangers of imperialism?
Unsurprisingly, Yang’s criticisms are largely misplaced. As Heather MacDonald recently highlighted in a fantastic piece for Quillette, the narrative that white people are the biggest perpetrators of violence against Asians is an erroneous one, not supported by actual data. However, in this age of feelings over facts, who cares about data? Facts are not funny. Then again, neither is SNL.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the purpose of comedy is to make people laugh, or at least it used to be. Instead, SNL producers spotted an opportunity to score woke, brownie points. They spotted an opportunity to deliver a poorly worded PSA disguised as a comedy sketch. Well, they failed, as this particular bit was neither informative nor was it funny. Just listen to the crowd. They don’t know whether to laugh or cry. They are caught somewhere between giggling and vomiting.
But, some may argue, stinging diatribes have always been a part of comedy. After all, Bill Hicks and George Carlin had plenty of issues with the country. Although this is true, both men had accumulated enough comedic capital to criticize America. These were legendary figures, and when they spoke, most people listened. Hicks and Carlin had put in the hours, earned the respect of their peers. In many ways, of all the comedians around at the time, they were two of the most qualified to preach to the masses. Who is Bowen Yang to lecture the American public? Who is Bowen Yang to tell American people to “do more”? Actually, who is Bowen Yang?
Also, when it comes to doing more, why can’t SNL “do more”? More specifically, why can’t SNL do more to make viewers laugh?
Bowen Yang is no Hicks or Carlin. He is, at best, an average comedian. Furthermore, he is an average comedian castigating millions of white viewers. How, in any way, is this acceptable? Perhaps, more importantly, how is this comedy?
SNL was once the Holy Grail of comedy. It was once a meritocracy, where only the best of the best, regardless of sex, race or skin color, made the cut. Funny wasn’t good enough. To get a spot on SNL, one had to be simply brilliant. This was a comedic colosseum, where great ideas battled it out for a five-minute segment. Gladiators like Eddie Murphy, Bill Murray, Adam Sandler, Steve Martin, Chris Farley, Amy Poehler, John Belushi, Billy Crystal, Tina Fey, and Steve Martin took to the stage. Truly brilliant comics delivering genuine moments of hilarity. No lecturing, just entertainment.
Those days, however, are long gone. SNL is no longer a meritocracy. If in doubt, ask yourself this: are the best comics and writers working on the show? Judging by the latest episode, the answer is clearly no.
SNL has been done for quite awhile. Really used to look forward to watching the original cast. Not funny at all these days. IMO
“Those days, however, are long gone. SNL is no longer a meritocracy.”
Is there some kind of requirement that people watch SNL?
“Spin Newspeak Live”.
I gave up in it entirely a year ago. It will never get better.
Tina Fey brilliant?...this guy is an idiot.
SNL has sucked since the Chris Farley era.
The last time that I saw anything funny on SNL was back about 1984. Eddie Murphy did a skit in white face and that was hilarious. I don’t think I have ever watched SNL since then. Now SNL is as funny as an IRS publication.
Tima Fey is as funny as a brick, same for Poehler. Radner was funny. SNL is less that worthless thanks to Loren Micheals. Time to bury it or find real talent who actually know funny.
I used to watch it EVERY week. After the third or fourth cast change, my viewing had dropped to once a month tops, and only if they had good guests, musical or otherwise. The writers weren’t as funny, the scenes contrived, just not fun anymore.
I honestly could not tell you the last time I watched it.
Sad, it was once the best part of the TV week.
It's not a comedy sketch if it's not in the least bit humorous. SNL used to have about 10% of their skits funny, it's down to about 1%. They are now the 1%ers.
I implore everyone to read that.
Thank you again, Kaslin, for the quality of the articles you tend to post here on FR.
She tries to steal the "act" that Kristen Wiig made funny. Fey is really not that good, the tallest comedic midget in that crowd.
I literally have not watched alphabet-network TV, drama or comedy in the last 8 years or so
I may very rarely click on such a show if I am bouncing through channels looking for something specific.
Its like time travel. Even over this relatively short period, I am amazed by changes in content. So much more political, more leftist, more race-baiting, much more sexual smut, and real continuation of the culture wars.
Lefties hate humor. "How can you laugh while Blah, Blah, Blah."
SNL hasn’t been funny since John Belushi died.
I wouldn’t know, but hear Saturday Night Live has been unfunny for decades.
Last time I watched I had no grey hairs, the regulars were funny - Chevy Chase, Jane Curtin, Bill Murray, Dan Ackroyd, Gilda Radner, John Belushi, Garrett Morris, etc... even Al Franken (when he was still funny).
I watched maybe one or two in the early ‘80s, but it was obvious as soon as Reagan got elected that humor was no longer the priority. All the funny ones left except Al Franken who stayed but lost his sense of humor.
There were a few exceptions - I liked Dennis Miller, Eddie Murphy, Will Farrell - but they were in plenty of movies so you didn’t have to watch Saturday Night Lecture to see them...
It became kind of obvious after 1980 how Leftist and shrill the program became - they pretty much alienated their entire non-Democrat audience...
Laughter is an emotion capable of nullifying one’s self-control.
Harris nods she has none.
That was about when I quit watching it, too, very early 80s. I realized I had watched an entire show without laughing even once.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.