Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Secretary of State Urges Pelosi to Stop the Overturn of Mariannette Miller-Meeks' Victory
Townhall ^ | 03/29/2021 | Reagan McCarthy

Posted on 03/29/2021 9:21:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

House Democrats are attempting to overturn the twice recounted, state- certified results of a congressional election in Iowa, and state officials are condemning House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “power grab.”

Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate penned a letter to Speaker Pelosi asking that she stop the attempted steal of Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks’ (R-IA) seat, emphasizing that the votes were recounted not once, but twice, and were certified by the bipartisan election commission.

“Our state had the closest U.S. House race in the country, with Mariannette Miller-Meeks defeating Rita Hart. Following a recount in all 24 counties in the Second Congressional District, Miller-Meeks won by six votes. The general election and recounts were conducted in a bipartisan manner. There are 12 Republican county auditors and 12 Democratic county auditors in the Second District. Bipartisan teams of precinct election officials staffed the polling places and processed the absentee ballots. The recount in all 24 counties was bipartisan,” Pate wrote to Pelosi.

He added that Hart sidestepped the state’s process to contest election results, the judicial system, and instead chose a partisan route.

“Unfortunately, Rita Hart chose to bypass the nonpartisan Iowa process and take her challenge to the U.S. House of Representatives where her political party has the power to grant her a seat she did not win...Now, Rita Hart is asking you to ‘depart from Iowa law’ and give her an election victory she did not earn. I strongly urge you to reject any attempts to overturn the will of Iowa votes. Mariannette Miller-Meeks is the official U.S. Representative for Iowa’s Second District and is serving the district capably. Let her continue to do the job Iowans elected her to do.”

The House Administration Committee is currently considering the case brought by Hart to challenge the certified results. Pelosi has said that a possible scenario for a duly elected representative, Miller-Meeks, to be unseated certainly exists.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; iowa; millermeeks; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/29/2021 9:21:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 03/29/2021 9:21:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There are seven House Democrats on record as being opposed to voting to overturn the election.

Pappas (NH), Phillips (MN), Wild (PA), Gottheimer (NJ), Corrrea (CA), Kildee (MI) and Elissa Slotkin (MI).

Pelosi can only lose 3.


3 posted on 03/29/2021 9:25:34 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Waste of time. Pelosi is power mad.................


4 posted on 03/29/2021 9:26:44 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Pelosi can likely buy the handful of votes she needs. Some of them can be persuaded.


5 posted on 03/29/2021 9:28:29 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What are the issues to justify an overturning?


6 posted on 03/29/2021 9:28:53 AM PDT by jasonandtheb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jasonandtheb

22 votes a Judge tossed out!


7 posted on 03/29/2021 9:32:14 AM PDT by mplc51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jasonandtheb

It was literally a margin of 6 votes, so I think they’re claiming that there were votes that were omitted improperly or something.

Its amazing that they are willing to do this after the high and mighty “how dare anyone consider questioning an election outcome?” stance from a couple months ago.


8 posted on 03/29/2021 9:33:11 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

If you really believe that, the Democrat ultimately winning Iowa-2 is selling for 8 cents a share on Predicit. Predicit is notoriously left-wing in its predictions as well.

Max out a bet at 850.00 and you will win 9,775.00.

I don’t think that you will do that.


9 posted on 03/29/2021 9:33:58 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Pelosi is the evil witch member of the coup regime and she thinks she’s in charge now that they have a dementia patient as “president” and a VP who doesn’t know her ass from a hole in the ground. Pelosi calls the military, makes the rules, runs the post office , SCOTUS and generally “runs things” via a “earpiece” connected to regime honchos. She belongs in jail. The water board the power hungry witch.
Better yet, burn her at the stake.


10 posted on 03/29/2021 9:40:10 AM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

A local Des Moines radio guy who is something of a political insider said Pelosi is arm-twisting and is one vote away from stealing the Congressional seat.


11 posted on 03/29/2021 9:40:28 AM PDT by jjotto (Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

No thanks. I don’t gamble. I invest. There’s a big difference.

If you can’t put a rational value on something there’s no sense in putting money into it IMO. Otherwise you’re just guessing.


12 posted on 03/29/2021 9:50:29 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jasonandtheb

“ What are the issues to justify an overturning?”

An R unexpectedly overcame the cheating threshold


13 posted on 03/29/2021 9:50:49 AM PDT by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
Its amazing that they are willing to do this after the high and mighty “how dare anyone consider questioning an election outcome?” stance from a couple months ago.

Because they control all information via their house media. Trump "tried to overturn a legal election", and the Iowa seat will be "votes were suppressed by white supremacist republicans".

14 posted on 03/29/2021 10:00:33 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

850.00 on predicit wins you 10000.


15 posted on 03/29/2021 10:19:28 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate penned a letter to Speaker Pelosi asking that she stop the attempted steal..."

Asking? ASKING?? Really? WHEN are we going to DEMAND?!

16 posted on 03/29/2021 10:32:56 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (May the 10 just men lacking in Sodom be found in America, for it’s sake of survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Pelosi is insistent on this, than there is only one way to answer it. If and it is an if, the GOP obtains control of the House, they should do this same thing to ONE and only ONE House seat. That is the seat of Nancy Pelosi. They should refuse to seat her and recognize her opponent as the winner.


17 posted on 03/29/2021 10:37:00 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
They should refuse to seat her and recognize her opponent as the winner.

Then proceed to strip her of her pension and lifetime health care. Besides HRC, Pelosi is one of the most toxic, cancerous influences on American politics in 230 years.
18 posted on 03/29/2021 11:05:03 AM PDT by farming pharmer (fork you :(){ :|:& };:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: farming pharmer

Pelosi is bad but Stacey Abrams is the most evil woman in America and while Pelosi is old, Abrams is the future of the Democrat Party.


19 posted on 03/29/2021 12:36:51 PM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jasonandtheb

From Orwell’s 1984:

The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power.

We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.

Power is not a means; it is an end. The object of power is power.


20 posted on 03/29/2021 3:19:30 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson