...not "science"
Posted on 03/09/2021 7:22:44 AM PST by Kaslin
Pro-maskers need to see that, for the other side, this supposed symbol of 'charity' and 'solidarity' has become the exact opposite.
Last week, Gov. Abbott announced Texas would completely reopen, lifting mask mandates and all limits on building capacity, the first large state in America to do so.
As one would expect, while some Texans celebrated the decision, throwing their masks and cowboy hats in the air, others lamented this “reckless” decision, as California Gov. Gavin Newsom put it. Not to be outdone by Newsom, Unifier-in-Chief Joe Biden called the decision “Neanderthal thinking.”
After a year of COVID-19 mandates, many and leftists alike have simply concluded this was the “new normal” and nothing would change. Yet it did. Still, even if the mandate is lifted, many stores and organizations will likely require masks. Some may even follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendation to double-mask.
The immediate reaction to Abbot’s announcement reveals something deeper about the mask phenomenon, however: over the months of wearing them, they have become powerful symbols. While some might argue about their effectiveness — an argument that has long since become political — most prefer to talk about what they mean more than what they do.
And what do they mean, exactly? For many pro-maskers, masks are a symbol of charity, health, and solidarity with those who have suffered from the virus. They remind healthy people that others at risk, they are responsible for them, and conformity is essential right now.
Those who don’t wear a mask are deemed selfish, ignorant, and dangerous. This likely means, unfortunately, that even with the mandate lifted, mask-shaming won’t necessarily come to an end.
Therefore, it’s not enough to review the declining number of hospitalizations or the negligible differences masks seem to make to explain how this could justify lifting the mandate. It’s time to refute the symbol. Pro-maskers need to see that, for the other side, this symbol of charity and solidarity has become the exact opposite.
To start, the most glaring problem behind masks is the hypocrisy of accusing those who dislike them as “selfish.” It doesn’t seem to occur to some of the mask supporters that forcing others to do something against their will is also selfish — like a bully telling his victim to stop hitting himself as he whacks him with the defendant’s own hand.
The usual defense against this charge is that requesting a person to wear a mask to save lives is no different from requesting a driver not to run over pedestrians or officer workers not to throw people out of buildings. But this is a false analogy. Going to a public place and breathing without a mask is clearly not the same as running over a person crossing the road.
Even for those who support masking, wearing a mask does not pose nearly as great a threat. Indeed, if it did pose the same threat level, everyone would be dead ten times over before the lockdowns even started.
This is probably why people have to use terms like “courteous” and “selfish,” as opposed to “homicidal” and “suicidal,” when discussing masks. The idea behind such language is to sound less extreme, but also to downplay what’s happening: people are giving up their freedom to breathe freely for the ostensible purpose of making their neighbor feel more secure.
This is no “minor inconvenience,” as some like to explain away, because such logic leads to an inevitable slippery slope: all freedoms can be excused as a “minor inconvenience” when done for the sake of preserving life in some way. The endpoint is the loss of all freedom, which, with COVID-19, has meant placing a whole population in lockdown. If people never leave their houses (or, better yet, their own bedrooms), lives will be saved and everyone will be safer.
It’s fair to assume, however, that many pro-maskers do not support lockdowns, seeing the damage they do, yet still think masks signal charity and support and should thus be worn. But is it right to mandate this and make it a law? It’s one thing to set a speed limit or outlaw trespassing to preserve life and property; it’s another thing to mandate masks to make people a little nicer and neighborly.
The first problem with mandating kindness, as St. Thomas Aquinas notes, is that enforcing such a rule creates more problems than it solves. It generates acrimony between neighbors, places a greater burden on law enforcement, and stigmatizes people who simply don’t believe in the mandate. Few people would argue that people are happier and feel safer now. Rather, it’s the opposite: people are less social, more paranoid, and generally despondent.
The second problem with mandating kindness, particularly with using the mask as a symbol, is that symbols aren’t reality. A mask may symbolize that someone cares about their neighbors and takes the virus seriously, but this doesn’t necessarily equate to actual care nor does it address the effects of the virus.
Unfortunately, confusing the symbol with reality is a common problem with any social awareness campaign, and COVID-19 is no exception. When people wear their pink bracelet, dump ice water on their head, or wear a mask, many of them feel like they have done their part, and this leads them to forego giving money or time to victims in need.
With all this in mind, I humbly ask my fellow Texans who are anxious about this Wednesday to live and let live. We’ve had a year of mask mandates, lockdowns, social distancing, and all the rest. These restrictions were never meant to be permanent but were ways of responding to the virus.
It’s time to give people back their freedom and let them decide to cover their faces or not. It will be a beautiful thing to behold and a fitting beginning to the spring season.
Oh, may I borrow that?
Masks don’t do a damn thing.
The reason people resent those of us not wearing masks is that we’re not afraid or obedient.
To them fear is a virtue.
People have finally learned to STAY HOME WHEN SICK.
That is a “new normal” we can all live with.
One of the long term outcomes of the scamdemic—I hope—it that we permanently remove any all incentives for coming to work or school when sick.
End “perfect attendance” awards.
End combined sick leave/vacation PTO
End dinging use (not abuse) of sick leave on annual reviews.
Sure! It’s yours....with a little tweak ;-)
This is EXACTLY what I’ve been saying! The Karens who maskshame, by calling those who question the requirement selfish are actually the selfish ones. If they are worried about their health, they need to take charge of it and wear a real mask to protect themselves. The irony of stigmatizing their fellow citizens as selfish is lost on those who impose their own desire for safety by demanding society wear masks and lockdown everything and everyone.
Thank you.
👍🏼👍🏼
Masks are 100% useless and furthermore have many negative health effects that go with it.
If you want to wear them, go right ahead, I won’t stop you from being silly.
For a fun exercise, read all these posts, but substitute “pants” for “masks.”
Keep your filthy germ infested mask to yourself and out of my space.
Masks do nothing to stop the spread. They do however support self righteousness and feelings of moral superiority as supported by your post
‘Keep your damn disease to yourself.’
oh, no, I’m being scolded by a scared little soy boy...if we can’t be FRiends, I just don’t know what I’m going to do...
Masks do nothing to stop the spread. They do however support self righteousness and feelings of moral superiority as supported by your post
You used to be one of those second hand smoke Nazis, didn’t you?
*oh, no, I’m being scolded by a scared little soy boy.*
.....Said the guy who’s scaaaaared of wearing a mask.
I rarely wear the stupid face diapers and am currently getting over bronchitis.
When I cough I just say “It’s just bronchitis, deal with it.”
The drive to do these things are related. A desire for power and control over strangers.
‘.....Said the guy who’s scaaaaared of wearing a mask.’
sheesh, such a comeback...but sorry, fella, the last thing I am is scared of wearing a a useless snotrag; what does frighten me is what I would say to some lippy little ninny that gets all uppity and in my face about not wearing a useless diaper over my mouth and nose...I’m araid of that, because by nature I avoid confrontation, and that would make me very angry, and then someone is not going to be happy, either the ninny or myself, or both...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.