Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

These Are The Shadowy New York Financial Institutions That Forced Robinhood To Restrict Trading In Certain Stocks
The Most Important News (TMIN) ^ | 02/01/2021 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 02/01/2021 12:15:55 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Alberta's Child

yes, but the price dropped bc of forced trades.


21 posted on 02/01/2021 2:13:43 PM PST by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: SeekAndFind

DTC is shadowy? The author is a few cards short of a full deck.


23 posted on 02/01/2021 2:43:43 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
These Are The Shadowy New York Financial Institutions That Forced Robinhood To Restrict Trading In Certain Stocks

I thought you might be interested in this Civil War related thread.

24 posted on 02/01/2021 4:12:50 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BiglyCommentary

Issued to who???? The shorts?


25 posted on 02/01/2021 8:53:26 PM PST by Pocketdoor (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uufeEhq25rc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Did the author even read the article? Lol I got 1\2way... I know a lot of freepers didnt. Robin hood should have just come clean at the start... Looks like they are going to lose a lot of customers for the wrong reason.


26 posted on 02/01/2021 8:57:10 PM PST by Pocketdoor (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uufeEhq25rc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pocketdoor

[Issued to who???? The shorts?]


At the market offerings have been used by more than one corporation to raise capital. For the shorts, it would be a godsend to see new supply on the market, given that the issuer could conceivably arrange to sell at a substantial discount to the market, while cleaning up. Would GME benefit from issuing 10m shares at $150, thereby netting $1.5b? I suspect so.


27 posted on 02/01/2021 10:37:50 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pocketdoor

To anyone who wants to buy the new shares. Do I really need to post that?


28 posted on 02/01/2021 11:14:20 PM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Would GME benefit from issuing 10m shares at $150, thereby netting $1.5b

Why would they sell them at $150 instead of the recent market prices? ($350-$250)? Do you think they are idiots?

29 posted on 02/01/2021 11:24:46 PM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What I received in my email account on Monday.

A note from Robinhood
We wanted to reach out to you after a transformative week in the markets to answer a question we know many of you are asking: “Why did Robinhood limit certain stocks?”

We understand that the temporary limits we placed on certain stocks this past week were frustrating for many, especially since we built Robinhood to expand access to investing. We have always sought to put our customers first and we want you to be able to invest on your own terms.

To help explain what happened and why we had to take action, we wrote a letter to our customers and captured the key understandings for you below:

For Robinhood to operate, we must meet clearinghouse deposit requirements to support customer trades.
Deposit requirements are determined in part by how much stock a firm’s customers hold. If a firm’s customers’ holdings are volatile, a broker (in this instance Robinhood) is obligated to meet higher deposit requirements.

Last week, in part due to volatility in some popular stocks, Robinhood’s deposit requirements rose tenfold. The combination of the deposit increase and the extraordinary increase in volume on these particular symbols led us to put temporary buying restrictions in place on a small number of those stocks.

We had to take steps to limit buying in those volatile stocks to ensure we could comfortably meet our deposit obligations. We didn’t want to stop people from buying stocks and we certainly weren’t trying to help hedge funds.

We hope you take away this: at Robinhood, we stand with everyday investors participating in the markets. Standing by our Robinhood community means being there for our customers through any trading environment. We’ll continue to improve as we break down barriers in the financial system to open it for all.

Thank you for being a part of the Robinhood community.

Sincerely,
The Robinhood Team


30 posted on 02/02/2021 12:16:20 AM PST by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
"I thought you might be interested in this Civil War related thread."

Right, yet again, Democrats doing what Democrats do.
No change there.

31 posted on 02/02/2021 7:09:11 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
Right, yet again, Democrats doing what Democrats do. No change there.

And what they have done since they were Republicans back in 1861. Same liberal power hungry bastards then, same liberal power hungry bastards now, and all still from the Northeastern part of the country.

32 posted on 02/02/2021 7:25:26 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
"And what they have done since they were Republicans back in 1861."

They were never Republicans, always Democrats, always allied with the dominant Democrats in Washington, DC., just as today.

Sure, during the CW itself, many Northern Democrats supported the Union, at least half-heartedly, i.e, Democrat Gen. McClellan.
But that was not the first instinct of New York's globalist Democrats, rather, they wanted to secede too!

They were not Republicans, then or now.

33 posted on 02/02/2021 7:42:13 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson