What’s the problem here?
First amendment means you can “speculate”, which is exactly what she said she was doing.
Is the problem people’s attempt to shine a light in dark places and ask questions.
I never got into qanon, for various reasons, but mostly because the things I was exposed to seemed far too cryptic and vague and deliberately ‘mysterious’.
But I always used to find reading up on conspiracy theories entertaining, just like creepy pasta or whodunits are entertaining. If you accept them as fictitious first, then you can assess them and appreciate them for how well formed and presented they are, if they are, which on the internet, is not often.
It is my experience that the varied concepts of a ruling elite in varied forms from the illuminati to bankers cabals all the way to the anunaki goes back to the 1990s on the internet, and much longer in books and print, including secret societies and hidden religious sects.
This facebook post in particular, and the reaction to it, only just seems to me to support the concept of the conspiracy, when all you are asking about are the coincidences (or not) of powerful people and how they appear to benefit from their connections. Going off on the space lasers definitely reads as pretty whack stuff, but questioning the who’s and how’s should not be a crime!
“This facebook post in particular, and the reaction to it, only just seems to me to support the concept of the conspiracy, when all you are asking about are the coincidences (or not) of powerful people and how they appear to benefit from their connections. Going off on the space lasers definitely reads as pretty whack stuff, but questioning the who’s and how’s should not be a crime!”
I’ll give you 1/2 credit for your post.