Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Rand Paul says Chief Justice Roberts won’t take Trump impeach trial
NY Post ^ | January 23, 2021 | 6:06pm | Mary Kay Linge

Posted on 01/23/2021 9:39:44 PM PST by conservative98

As Democrats plunge ahead with a post-term impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, a key question remains: Will Chief Justice Roberts take the case?

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky says he won’t — making the exercise “a fake, partisan impeachment,” the lawmaker told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Friday.

Paul claimed Roberts has “privately said he’s not supposed to come unless it’s an impeachment of the president.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: attainder; impeachment; johnroberts; paul; randpaul; roberts; scotus; senate; supremecourt; tds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2021 9:39:44 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative98

2 posted on 01/23/2021 9:41:03 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Rand is a fool if he believes this. roberts will be there with bells on.


3 posted on 01/23/2021 9:42:30 PM PST by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I bet Roberts’ mind can be changed, or else the blackmail becomes real.


4 posted on 01/23/2021 9:42:56 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

That quisling little bastard will do as his masters tell him to do.


5 posted on 01/23/2021 9:43:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

It’s his job. His butt better be at the seat. He’s paid to do this.


6 posted on 01/23/2021 9:44:21 PM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

If true Roberts got this one right.

The constitution is clear.. impeachment’s are for Presidents.

Trump is no longer President so he cannot be impeached.


7 posted on 01/23/2021 9:44:37 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

I heard someone state that if the Chief Justice refused to preside at the trial, then the presiding officer would be the vice president.


8 posted on 01/23/2021 9:44:44 PM PST by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Mark Levin said on his show yesterday that if he recuses then Kamala Harris could preside over the case.


9 posted on 01/23/2021 9:44:48 PM PST by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I think he’s going to tell Chucky Schumucky Schumer to stick it.


10 posted on 01/23/2021 9:45:04 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

If he comes he legitimizes an unConstitutional action.

IF he doesn’t, the Democrats will use it to justify packing
the court.

Now, do you want the bad news...


11 posted on 01/23/2021 9:45:38 PM PST by DoughtyOne (There is no next time Mitch. Aren't you proud now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

He said that’s just what the libtards in the press are saying and said they are just making things up


12 posted on 01/23/2021 9:46:00 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

You would be correct. Mark Levin yesterday said Kamala Harris would be the one to preside over the case.


13 posted on 01/23/2021 9:46:33 PM PST by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Well we’ll see.


14 posted on 01/23/2021 9:47:33 PM PST by White Lives Matter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint
"When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside:"
15 posted on 01/23/2021 9:49:24 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

It’s his job. His butt better be at the seat. He’s paid to do this.


He’s paid to oversee impeachment trials of the President. So...Biden.


16 posted on 01/23/2021 9:50:15 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Why doesn’t the full Supreme Court decide if post facto impeachment is Constitutional?


17 posted on 01/23/2021 9:51:20 PM PST by euclid216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Guess we’ll find out if Roberts is being blackmailed once and for all!


18 posted on 01/23/2021 9:51:45 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

The Constitution does not support impeaching a private citizen ... but when has that old rag meant a damned thing to the filthy little Roberts pirate.


19 posted on 01/23/2021 9:51:55 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

From the landscape, I think Roberts is looking at how this will play out after Trump. You could have various charges drawn up on dead Democratic Presidents (probably even President Jackson, and President Theodore Roosevelt. This would not be limited to just Presidents or judges....it’d extend down to Senators. You could be looking at five or six impeachments per year just being ‘normal’, and the dead folks not having any real ability to defend themselves.

Robert’s view might be....I’ve got a full-time job now....what idiot would sign up for more work with potential charges over retired Presidents/Senators/House members?


20 posted on 01/23/2021 9:51:55 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson