Something that has not been addressed about this "no standing" decision is Bush vs Florida in 2000. IIRC, the Bush complaint was about Florida changing it's own election laws mid-stream. Believe it started with the AG and up to the Florida Supreme Court. Their own State Constitution said such Electoral law could only be changed by their Legislature.
The USSC agree with Bush and stopped the re-re-counting of ballots in Broward County which gave Bush some 500 vote victory. I fail to see why a State (Texas and supporters) was not given the same judicial process, since many counties and complete States of MI, WI, PA, GA did similar and went against their own State Constitution electoral laws without due legislation. What am I missing?
I side with the minority opinion they should've heard their cases. Problem is they would've lost the case as congress are the ones that abattoir the election not the Supreme court. Though they DID require a statement from those states. That is important moving forward.
Wait for the office of DNI report along with the DHS report. Biden/Harris can't win as they (will be) labeled officially a national security threat. Once that report is out there is nothing that can change the out come. We got this
Bush v. Gore was limited to Florida. You didn't have another state claiming that what happened in Florida disenfranchised their voters. Any complaints about how Pennsylvania conducts its elections impacts Pennsylvania voters not Texas ones. So it's a matter for Pennsylvania to deal with, which they did in the Kelly v. Pennsylvania decision.