Trump Uses Rally for Georgia Senate Candidates to Push Unsupported Claims of Voting Fraud (BARF ALERT!!)

Wall Street Journal, via MSN ^ | Dec. 6, 2020 | Rebecca Ballhaus, Cameron McWhirter

[libstripper]

VALDOSTA, Ga.—President Trump tried to use his unsupported claims of widespread voting fraud to boost turnout in two Senate runoff elections next month, urging supporters at a rally here to re-elect two senators but oust other local officials he blames for his own election loss.

[Steve_Seattle]

"There has been a lot of evidence put forward that, if true, supports President Trump’s claim that the election is stolen. Is the evidence disputed, yes it is. But had they used the word ‘disputed’ that would have implied that there are two sides to this story. By using ‘unsupported’ they are saying there is only one side, so shut up!"

An excellent summary. It is absolutely maddening the way this lie that no evidence has been presented has taken root. As you say, they could claim that the evidence is disputed, but they don't even do that.

I've seen film of some of the eyewitness testimony, and some of the witnesses were so shocked by what they saw, and how they've been treated, that they were near tears. That's what happens to people when they are told to deny the evidence of their own eyes.

[Steve_Seattle]

I don’t see any difference - legal or otherwise - between “unsupported claims” and “without evidence.” “Unsupported” means “without evidence.”

[Chengdu54]

Imagine if they wrote: “...to push unsupported claims of racism....”

[BigEdLB]

Authors of this are added to the treason trial list

[libstripper]

Mega, MAGA congratulations to all of you who commented. YOU REALLY NAILED THE LYING WSJ ON THIS ONE!!!

[Defiant]

It’s just like with ridiculous claims of Trump colluding with Russia. First they’ll deny, then when they’re proven wrong, they will ignore it.

[Steve_Seattle]

As I’ve said, for them - whether judges or the media - to acknowledge the fraud puts them in a psychologically untenable position, because to actually deal with fraud of this magnitude would require unprecedented remedies on a mass scale, and they simply don’t want to go there, ESPECIALLY if they don’t like Trump to begin with.

[bitt]

[Flick Lives]

And stop being obsessed with “dealines.” FRAUD NEGATES EVERYTHING. Any contract or transaction obtained through fraud is illegal.

—

Yup. The Lance Armstrong doping scandal comes to mind. Once uncovered, Lance was stripped of his Tour D’France victories. It wasn’t like, “oh well, you fooled us this time. Sure, keep the trophy!”

[Son House]

And what they like about that is Mr Biden will get a old media free pass on his incoherent answers, while we struggle to understand his level of comprehension on the election fraud. But that isn’t going to be relevant if it has goes to court to be settled.

To which I would like to believe election officials and legislatures are going to finally be cognitive of the consequences of playing along with this fraud will get them nowhere.

[Steve_Seattle]

"deadlines"

There are statutes of limitations for some crimes, but only after years have passed. Here, they are saying that a month is too long, ignoring that it takes time to collect evidence and build a case. Many crimes don't go to trial for months or even years. The "deadlines" excuse is just that - an excuse - as is the claim that the complainants "lack standing."

[libstripper]

If the WSJ had wanted to do a real public service, they’d have run a careful article, written by a qualified election lawyer, that analyzed PDJT’s claims of election fraud, the arguments against those claims, and concluded which side presented the better case, not this lying, unprofessional, and disgraceful monstrosity that could have been “written” by any suitably trained potty mouthed seventh grader.

[MHT]

Why even post something from the WSJ and MSM? You know what the spin is going to be before you read the first word. It is discouraging to have to deal with them in the real world, muchless hear their echos on FR.

No criticism of the post-er is intended. It is just an unpleasant reminder of the messaging strength of our enemies. Kinda like Tokyo Rose...

[Candor7]

Unsupported claims?

They are trying to play out the clock for electors day 14th December.And they have failed. Now the roll out begins!

I mean its pretty clear.

They cracked the Dominion cheating algorithm in Ware County Georgia.

https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335596122581176321

Robb Hurst, CPA
🐸
@robbhurstCPA
·
5h
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm:

Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.
Robb Hurst, CPA
🐸
@robbhurstCPA
·
5h
37 Trump votes used in the equal sample run had been “Switched” from Trump to Biden. In actual algorithmic terms this means that a vote for Trump was counted as 87% of a vote and a vote for Biden was counted as 113% of a vote.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

Nothing new from the media. Still sticking with the unsupported claims argument.

This actually makes reading any news story a lot easier. No New News.

On the other hand ‘We the People’ can also say nobody has verified that the votes cast and counted were by voters who were legitimate in all aspects of Election Laws.

[libstripper]

No criticism of the post-er is intended. It is just an unpleasant reminder of the messaging strength of our enemies. Kinda like Tokyo Rose...y
______________________________ ___________________________

If you go out into the country to go shooting on your own, you need to put up targets to shoot at. This article, especially coming from the otherwise respectable WSJ, is such a stinking, unprofessional pile of incompetent filth, that it HAD to be posted just so we FReepers could shoot it to pieces, as we have admirably done.

[Still Thinking]

....say the people ordering or asking permission to clear the voting machines. If there’s no there there, what’s the risk? In fact, why don’t you get forensic examiners on the machines yourselves and prove Trump’s a quack?

[Bob434]

i BARFED when i read your post and am outraged

Not for any reason mind you- i just felt liek it lol

[libstripper]

OMG! The WSJ has really sunk to the bottom by making a ventriloquist’s dummy, who won’t even do the most basic research before repeating a blatant lie, its “WHITE HOUSE REPORTER.” If it needs to have accurate, professional reporters anywhere, the WH is where it needs to have them.

[ridesthemiles]

I am old enough to remember when the Wall Street Journal was the top of the good info list.