Skip to comments.
Trump will veto defense bill unless legal protections for Big Tech are removed
lifesitenews ^
| 12/02/2020
| Michael Haynes
Posted on 12/02/2020 9:06:11 PM PST by xomething
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: xomething
Amistad Lawyer: FBI Collecting Data on Vote FraudNewsMax 30 November 2020
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fbi-voter-fraud/2020/11/30/id/999369/ [Excerpt:]
"Kline said all of the areas investigated 'had hundreds of millions of dollars poured into their election offices by Mark Zuckerberg.'
The Facebook CEO, Kline said, poured in $400 million into the election, matching the federal government expenditures, through his charities.
'They paid the election judges, they paid the people who boarded up the windows, they bought the machines and America was kicked out of the counting room, and a billionaire invited in, in all of the swing state urban core cities, and that is a violation the law.'"
21
posted on
12/02/2020 11:43:09 PM PST
by
familyop
To: xomething
22
posted on
12/02/2020 11:43:48 PM PST
by
familyop
To: xomething; All
Pointless. Dems never supported our military anyway. This is a win-win for them.
23
posted on
12/03/2020 12:07:22 AM PST
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
To: Helicondelta
The President might as well go nuclear. They're going to whine and complain anyways.
And they've all been part of the 4-year coup attempts.
24
posted on
12/03/2020 1:35:09 AM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: xomething
25
posted on
12/03/2020 1:39:34 AM PST
by
HollyB
To: xomething
To: xomething
Good. I trust President Trump vetoes the bill. Enough is enough, folks.
JoMa
27
posted on
12/03/2020 2:30:47 AM PST
by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: xomething
What leverage does President Trump have on this bill? Do they need this bill that much for the dogs to betray their masters?
28
posted on
12/03/2020 2:57:12 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: xomething
Why not lay out paths to contest a platform’s eligibility for 230 protections, such as when they censor stories and selectively ban people for partisan purposes?
29
posted on
12/03/2020 3:14:54 AM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(To be good, you've got to be tough as boots. - Jordan Peterson)
To: xomething
Amazing how people yell that the RICH companies and people on the right do all the bad things in life, YET there are far, far more rich companies and people on the LEFT that promote all the crap in this nation, get the big breaks, make our lives suck, and yet people think it is our side, when it is far, far worse by the commie side. THEY get all these big breaks and hide their crap, not us. But, NO, the STUPIDS of this nation and world BELIEVE all the B.S. of the left. Eat it with a huge spoon and eat it all day long.
30
posted on
12/03/2020 4:10:58 AM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(Friends, are you prepared to meet the LORD? Do you KNOW Him? Time is running out.)
To: Beagle8U
The closest Sleepy Joe will get to the White House is a mock-up of the Oval Office in either an old folks home, or prison.
31
posted on
12/03/2020 4:31:31 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: Starcitizen
This just after the fake hearings on big tech being bad for censoring...
What a joke.
32
posted on
12/03/2020 4:52:05 AM PST
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security in hates:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: xomething
Stick to your guns Mr. President.
Republicans are wavering, whimpering about whether their conservative blogs could be sued out of existence.
Censorship by Big Tech. Put them on a level playing field! See how the ba$tards like that.
33
posted on
12/03/2020 6:13:04 AM PST
by
Candor7
((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html) )
To: Eleutheria5
Why not lay out paths to contest a platform’s eligibility for 230 protections, such as when they censor stories and selectively ban people for partisan purposes?
Because selectively banning partisan TeamD trolls from this site is a good policy and should not result in the site owner losing Section 230 protection.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson