Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

If this wasn’t being said while the Left is proverbially raping the electorate it might have merit.

There is no sanctity when the election is being stolen.


39 posted on 11/21/2020 5:23:09 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne; mass55th; joethedrummer; Impy
>> If this wasn’t being said while the Left is proverbially raping the electorate it might have merit. There is no sanctity when the election is being stolen. <<

Exactly. IF this election had ACTUALLY been "safe and secure" (e.g. there was a nationwide vote-in-person with Photo ID rule in effect, and it was ACTUALLY enforced), and Trump's approval rating was in the toilet and he was running against an actually likeable, charming, and sane RAT ticket (let's say Tulsi Gabbard/Andrew Yang, the least odious RATS from the primary), and the Gabbard/Yang ticket was clearly leading in all the swing states throughout election night so there was no doubt Trump lost and square, but Trump refused to concede anyway and wanted to contest the results...

THEN Liz Cheney's blathering about how Trump needs to be "respecting the electoral process" would be totally justified and accurate.

As it stands, the opposite is the true, its the RATS who are NOT respecting the "sanctity" of our electoral process.

mass55th makes a great point too, Liz is particularly hypocritical here since dead ol' dad has his own bitterly contested election where the RATS viciously attacked him as illegitimate and demanded he step aside.

88 posted on 11/21/2020 7:34:32 PM PST by BillyBoy ("States rights" is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson