Posted on 11/20/2020 9:10:23 AM PST by uzumaki_naruto
When I first saw this in Germany, I thought they were pitchers. Then, I realized that they were mugs. That was the point at which I realized that Germans were serious drinkers.
The beer garden had racks for patrons to store their personal steins.
What is the "This" of your statement?! Powell stated yesterday that servers were seized in Germany. She further discussed it on TV last night.
I hope that is true, but too many unverified second hand sources these days.
RE: I am reliably informed that a unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA, not Dominion or Sctyl.
Well, if these are unrelated to Dominion or Scytl then it simply means we are making a big deal about an UNRELATED raid. This raid is most probably a red herring and is not about servers that help manipulate election tabulation. It’s about some other crime.
The implications of it being the other side are simply stunning: The US on 11/3 experienced a military Coup D'Etat (or, perhaps Flu D'Etat).
I believe based on the actors involved and their actions, that "good guys" have the servers. I'll just act accordingly, and hope I'm not proven wrong, as the alternative is just too immense to ponder.
I thought there were Jugs somewhere in there.
RE: Powell stated yesterday that servers were seized in Germany. She further discussed it on TV last night.
I posted this before but I’ll post this again to elicit comments. Assuming that there indeed was a raid, there are many things we do not know.
1) We do not know WHICH AGENCY conducted the raid.
2) We do not know if it was done with or without the knowledge or consent of the German government.
3) We do not know if the raid on the server is related to the current election or some other issue.
4) MOST TROUBLING ( and Sidney Powell even confirmed her ignorance about this ), We do not know if whoever is in possession of the server will be scrubbing the data from it, or keeping it for presentation of evidence in court.
Too many unknowns here. I’m afraid we are letting our collective desires for something to be so get the better of us.
We’ll have to wait and see. If they are, then they are forensically diseccted and all incoming and outgoing data/commands collated with the actions taken in each of the states who flipped huge numbers of non-voted votes. digitally.
NOW THAT would be evidence, hmmmm?
Or the CIA is involved. Would that be surprising? At this point, I don’t think so.
RE: I suspect that no matter how much evidence is presented for it being true, people like you will never accept any of it so I’m not wasting my time doing research for you
BTW, We have another thread on Sidney Powell’s so-called “confirmation” of the US Army raid on the servers at the Glen Beck show.
See this thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3907979/posts
Unfortunately, many FR posters in that thread are saying that it was SECOND HAND INFORMATION that Powell received, not first hand.
Reading your post, I was kinda hoping and get the impression that she had FIRST HAND INFORMATION.
Or a push-up bra. The view is mostly blocked there.
...CIA is involved....
_______________________
They ran it.
Prove me wrong.
1. the agency was the US Army Europe; the city was Frankfort, Germany.
2. the location was a CIA asset. The server was being used before the election in coordinating police work, and had been raided earlier in September.
3. the malware used in the election was allegedly developed by the CIA for Venezuela.
4. last word was that the 'good' guys have the server now;
5. and they are aware that the Dominion Voting machines in GA were set to non-integer counting mode. In other words, RCV (ranked choice voting where winner predetermined and percentages of margins are used to reallocate actual votes to ballot counts.)
6. witness statement presents totals from the server back to the counties in non-integer counts.
RE: The server was being used before the election in coordinating police work, and had been raided earlier in September.
If they raided it before the elections, it stands to reason that they suspected that the server was being used or is going to be used for nefarious purposes. WHY DID THEY STILL LET THE SERVER OPERATE TILL NOW?
RE: last word was that the ‘good’ guys have the server now;
So, the US Army got the server raiding a CIA asset. Does this mean that the US Army are the good guys and the CIA are the bad guys?
Question: If a US Asset is in a foreign country, can we simply do a raid on our own asset without permission from the host country?
The knife fight in the dark between the varying intelligence and military agencies controlled by the globalists and the patriots may be revealed in a book thirty years from now...if the patriots win.
No reason to yell, the new owners from the recent bankruptcy sale of Dominion obviously got paid by one or two political parties (3, if you count Bernie) to queer the elections to their advantage. It worked so well against Biden, ol' Sleepy Joe was quite confident with his cheat in the election.
Considering what RideForever said above . . .
I am looking at the Democracy Suite(R) EMS Results Tally & Reporting User Guide (Version: 5.11-CO::7) of May 28, 2019.
https://www.oann.com/files/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf
There are several pages regarding “Ranked Contests” and “Ranked Choice Voting” (RCV).
Controls and features of that, are part of the software.
In the following “EXCERPT”, I am going to separate sentences of the FIRST PARAGRAPH, in order to make it easier to read and consider.
EXCERPT:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CHAPTER 11: RANKED CHOICE VOTING
11.1 Introduction
[FIRST PARAGRAPH]
Ranked choice voting (RCV) allows voters to rank their candidates in order of preference from first to last ranking, which is different compared to traditional forms of voting where the voter can only express equal preference for one or more candidates by marking their voting box.
This additional information that the ranking provides can be processed using different ways to declare one or more winner in a way to ensure elected candidates receive a majority of the vote.
What most of these methods have in common is that they process the results in rounds.
In the initial round only the first ranked candidates are evaluated, if any candidate achieves the majority of the votes these are elected.
Otherwise, another round starts and candidates with the lowest amount of votes are eliminated.
Those ballots get redistributed according to their subsequent rankings, and votes are evaluated to determine winners.
This process avoids the need to do run-off elections, while still ensuring candidates receive a majority of the vote.
[SECOND PARAGRAPH]
There are various forms of RCV supported in EMS and each variation has a number of settings which are managed through Ranked Profiles.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As I look at the manual, it does seem, that DESPITE RCV not being authorized by a jurisdiction (national, state, local), RCV can certainly be enabled.
... against Biden s/b against Sanders)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.