Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court *Rejects* Pennsylvania Republicans’ Second Attempt To Block Extended Ballot Deadline
Twitter ^ | 10/28/20 | Steven Mazie

Posted on 10/28/2020 3:00:54 PM PDT by Enlightened1

BREAKING: Supreme Court *rejects* Pennsylvania Republicans’ second attempt to block extended ballot deadline.

 

https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1321561198731603970

 

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ballotdeadline; bidenvoters; extended; paping; pennsylvania; post12; republican; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Per the Public Information Office: "Justice Barrett did not participate in the consideration of this motion because of the need for a prompt resolution of it and because she has not had time to fully review the parties’ filings."

 

https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1321562228097769473

 

1 posted on 10/28/2020 3:00:54 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1; Drew68
THIS is why President Trump's win must be truly MASSIVE.

Anything less and it WILL be stolen by the Courts.

2 posted on 10/28/2020 3:02:42 PM PDT by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Well, take your time Justice Barret.


3 posted on 10/28/2020 3:03:09 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Why did John Roberts rush it?

He should have included Justice Barrett


4 posted on 10/28/2020 3:04:18 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They should have waited till she was seated and settled in before refiling.
Ah well.
The fight continues after the elections.


5 posted on 10/28/2020 3:04:42 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Is that a non recusal recusal?


6 posted on 10/28/2020 3:04:48 PM PDT by teletech (you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

The Republicans need to fight fire with fire then.


7 posted on 10/28/2020 3:05:18 PM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Kagan and Sotomayor should have recused themselves.


8 posted on 10/28/2020 3:06:42 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Roberts being a jerk for not including the new Justice, to achieve his political end.


9 posted on 10/28/2020 3:06:59 PM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Apparently Barrett couldn’t participate the briefing took place before she was seated. Republicans should immediately refile.


10 posted on 10/28/2020 3:07:19 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Already a turncoat?...


11 posted on 10/28/2020 3:09:46 PM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

From Justice Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Kavanaugh:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf

That does not mean, however, that the state court decision must escape our review. Although the Court denies the motion to expedite, the petition for certiorari remains before us, and if it is granted, the case can then be decided under a shortened schedule. In addition, the Court’s denial of the motion to expedite is not a denial of a request for this Court to order that ballots received after election day be segregated so that if the State Supreme Court’s decision is ultimately overturned, a targeted remedy will be available.

Petitioner represents that it will apply to this Court to obtain that modest relief, Reply in Support of Motion for Expedited Review 3, and Respondent DPP agrees that such
relief is appropriate, Opp. to Motion for Expedited Review
7. Although the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected Petitioner’s request for that relief, we have been informed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General that the Secretary of
the Commonwealth issued guidance today directing county
boards of elections to segregate ballots received between
8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020, and 5:00 p.m. on November
6, 2020. Nothing in the Court’s order today precludes Petitioner from applying to this Court for relief if, for some reason, it is not satisfied with the Secretary’s guidance.


12 posted on 10/28/2020 3:09:49 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Oops, not Kavanaugh.

Gorsuch, Alito and Thomas.


13 posted on 10/28/2020 3:10:33 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MHT

No.


14 posted on 10/28/2020 3:10:42 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

We know Obama weaponized intel. He has something on Roberts, because shortly after O got into office, Roberts tacked left. Trump probably either knows the details or has good idea.


15 posted on 10/28/2020 3:11:49 PM PDT by SteelPSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Alito is being very clear that if late-arriving ballots are determinative, the court could still weigh in.


16 posted on 10/28/2020 3:12:01 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

So it was not denied on the merits, just denied for an immediate injunction, and the GOP can request the court to order that all ballots received after the original deadline be kept separate and not counted until the issue is settled by SCOTUS. So not a total defeat - the tricky part will be making sure the precincts in Pittsburgh and Philly actually separate those and don’t count them - once they are added in, there is no way to undo it.


17 posted on 10/28/2020 3:14:46 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

“Well, take your time Justice Barret.”
************************************
Dude, aim your fire at the right target — the DESPICABLE John Roberts!


18 posted on 10/28/2020 3:16:03 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: apillar

>>Republicans should immediately refile.
******************************************
Damn straight and amen.

Start reading and reviewing, Amy. Your country needs you. Your country is counting on you.


19 posted on 10/28/2020 3:17:57 PM PDT by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I went back to the tweet now. Five minutes ago it showed a statement from the court saying that the petition could be considered after the election. Due to this, the request to segregate the late ballots was approved. That left open the possibility of rejecting them post election. Now there’s a big Twitter statement saying the copy of that statement has been deleted by the author. Twitter is just saying screw it, we’ll do as we please. Also the original NY Post article was up. I retweeted it 5 times. Now I can’t retweet anything. No warning, no explanation, just shut down.


20 posted on 10/28/2020 3:19:13 PM PDT by hardspunned (MAGA, now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson