Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Trump 52-47 approval. Approval gap 0.
Rasmussen ^ | 10/28/2020 | Rasmussen

Posted on 10/28/2020 7:08:56 AM PDT by TexasGurl24

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: SelfhatingMillennial

From a fellow long distance runner . Excellent analogy and insight


101 posted on 10/28/2020 7:40:30 PM PDT by patriotspride (Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

I keep thinking maybe I should go open the cages. But the little ones running around, I could just take those in my car I guess. We had one that kept coming up here and I kept trying to make it today. I was giving it to cat treats! But she didn’t stick around.


102 posted on 10/28/2020 7:44:34 PM PDT by CottonBall (A Republican's power comes from your prosperity. A Democrat's power comes from your poverty.Good for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

I haven’t heard that about San Francisco kids. I know California had to put in the high school exit exam because kids were graduating without being able to read or write very well. So what is it about San Francisco?


103 posted on 10/28/2020 7:47:51 PM PDT by CottonBall (A Republican's power comes from your prosperity. A Democrat's power comes from your poverty.Good for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Apparently everybody is dumb in San Francisco. After all look at who they elect.


104 posted on 10/28/2020 8:06:41 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall
There really are inbred Hillbillies in the Appalachians, and I am living among them.

You are spreading an ignorant and unfair stereotype. It may be a funny comedic tool, but it is not really accurate. The incidence of “inbreeding” in the Appalachian area defined as people marrying their first cousins at least in this time period is no greater than in other parts of the country. This stereotype did not originate in the South from actual observation... it started in places like New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware and Connecticut where people have a strong need to feel superior while they fleece the rest of the country. They especially don't like places where people still have a modicum of self sufficiency. Kids and people with low IQ’s are spread fairly uniformly all around the country.

105 posted on 10/29/2020 7:26:47 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

As a former military family I have lived all over the country (including Appalachia) and I can tell you there are ignorant, animal abusing, low IQ people in every single state. It is a silly stereotype and those kind of people aren’t exclusive to Appalachia.


106 posted on 10/29/2020 7:39:48 AM PDT by Homeschoolmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Fatass Stirewalt on Fox right now saying “his numbers” show Wisconsin, NC, GA, and probably Florida going to democrats,


107 posted on 10/29/2020 7:47:17 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

John Anderson was in the 1980 election also.

But, as I recall, even if every single person who voted for John Anderson had voted for Jimmy Carter instead, Ronald Reagan would still have won, both the popular vote and Electoral College.


108 posted on 10/29/2020 8:20:32 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Right, the 1992 case was the only one extreme enough to provably make a difference.

In 1996, Perot got close to 10%, but even at that level it becomes difficult to argue that it changed the outcome. Dole would have gotten a lot closer, but I think Clinton would still have squeaked out a victory.

With 1992 there was no doubt: Bush would have kicked Clinton’s ass to the curb without Ross Perot in the race.


109 posted on 10/29/2020 8:39:03 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Its a coordinated media strategy with fake polls to try and dissuade some Trump voters not to vote. Trump as already won https://joeisdone.github.io/florida/ once you extrapolate demographic data all swings states go to Trump from this, media trying to keep it close. Bookmark it; Biden won’t get more than 47% MAX(ceiling) Trump 48-53%.


110 posted on 10/29/2020 8:52:31 AM PDT by bte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

That’s ridiculous. They are so insulting of our intelligence. I turned those emergency notifications off. I don’t care of there’s a nuclear warhead incoming, I don’t need their stupid warnings. I’m prepred.


111 posted on 10/29/2020 10:51:25 AM PDT by RushCrush (Prayers up for Rush Hudson Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bte

That is probably correct... in the ballpark. Against Hillary, Rasmussen had Trump -2% of the national vote and, of course, Trump picked off the electoral votes. If Trump is up 2% nationally on Nov 3rd then Trump will be 4 - 5% better than 2016 and he gets both electoral and national vote with maybe 340 or better electorally.


112 posted on 10/29/2020 11:13:37 AM PDT by Lagmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: All

I’m wondering if the Libertarian vote will collapse this election, the last few have they not had 4-5 per cent? What libertarian in his/her right mind would want to take a chance on Biden over Trump? Trump is pretty close to being a declared Libertarian himself, just has a few big government preferences but certainly no big threat to individual liberty. With a transfer of half of that previous Libertarian vote to Trump, it could make a difference. Hope so.


113 posted on 10/29/2020 2:10:44 PM PDT by Peter ODonnell (Pray for health, economic recovery, and justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: IVAXMAN

IVAXMAN wrote:

<<
Trump may lose still in a very close election, but there is the distinct possibility he does much better then most are thinking he will.
>>

**************************************************************

Trump losing but “doing much better than most are thinking he will” would be no consolation whatsoever. If we lose this election, then America as you and I know and love it will be no more and soon gone forever.

You can bet Trump is in this thing to settle for no other option but WINNING!! Any other outcome would not only be unacceptable, but unthinkable!


114 posted on 10/29/2020 10:44:07 PM PDT by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson