I would suppose this means that you cannot outright reject a ballot because a signature does not match but you would have to contact the voter in order to seek a signature verification.
“””I would suppose this means that you cannot outright reject a ballot because a signature does not match but you would have to contact the voter in order to seek a signature verification.”””
You read the ruling as I see it. Namely, they cannot automatically toss a ballot where the signature does not match. Instead they have to contact the person and have that person present themselves with valid ID and current signature.
the ruling does not seem to be a problem and we should not get all worked up over it.