Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Et Tu, Classmates? Barrett's Fellow Rhodes College Alumni Resort to 'Hate Group' Smears Against ACB
PJ Media ^ | 09/28/2020 | Tyler O'Neil

Posted on 09/28/2020 12:05:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Amy Coney Barrett’s former classmates and even sorority sisters signed a letter to the president of her alma mater, Rhodes College, resorting to some far-left smear tactics to oppose President Donald Trump’s nomination of Barrett to the Supreme Court. Among other things, the alumni’s letter savages ACB for speaking at an event sponsored by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), citing the far-left scandal-plagued smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) accusation that ADF is a “hate group” worthy of inclusion on a list with the Ku Klux Klan.

The letter’s signatories say many of them were “contemporaries of, friends of, and even sorority sisters of Amy Coney Barrett” and that, “despite the respect that many of us hold for her intellect, and even the friendship that many of us held or continue to hold with her, we are firmly and passionately opposed to her nomination.”

In fact, the alumni declare themselves “firmly and passionately opposed to Rhodes administrators’ attempts to embrace Amy Coney Barrett as an alumna of our beloved alma mater. We oppose this embrace because we believe both her record and the process that has produced her nomination are diametrically opposed to the values of truth, loyalty, and service that we learned at Rhodes.”

Under the heading of “truth,” the alumni accuse Barrett of having “obfuscated” her position and record on “issues related to Rhodes’ LGBTQ and female alumni.” ACB’s former classmates note that the nominee pledged to uphold Supreme Court precedent — such as Roe v. Wade (1973) — during her confirmation hearings for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, but in a 2013 Texas Law Review article, she said: “a justice’s duty is to the Constitution” and therefore it would be legitimate to strike down a precedent in conflict with the Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acb; adf; amyconeybarrett; classmates; hategroup; judiciary; politicaljudiciary; rhodescollege; scotus; scotusnominee; smearcampaign; splc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2020 12:05:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Yale kids did the same to Justice Kavanaugh.


2 posted on 09/28/2020 12:06:33 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here is the letter from her fellow former alumni at Rhodes College (you can see the signatories in that letter) :

https://www.facebook.com/RhodesAlumniAgainstACBNomination/posts/104627561405048

The signatories condemn Barrett for belonging to “the Notre Dame chapter of the anti-choice group University Faculty for Life” and argue that the Federalist Society would only approve a nominee who “is willing to overturn or seriously curtail Roe v. Wade.”

Naturally, the alumni do not admit the fact that Roe v. Wade rests on extremely dubious reasoning, twisting the Fourteenth Amendment to include a right to abortion even though America was tightening abortion restrictions while Congress passed that amendment.


3 posted on 09/28/2020 12:06:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


4 posted on 09/28/2020 12:07:03 PM PDT by sauropod (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Here is the letter from her fellow former alumni at Rhodes College (you can see the signatories in that letter) :

https://www.facebook.com/RhodesAlumniAgainstACBNomination/posts/104627561405048

The signatories condemn Barrett for belonging to “the Notre Dame chapter of the anti-choice group University Faculty for Life” and argue that the Federalist Society would only approve a nominee who “is willing to overturn or seriously curtail Roe v. Wade.”

Naturally, the alumni do not admit the fact that Roe v. Wade rests on extremely dubious reasoning, twisting the Fourteenth Amendment to include a right to abortion even though America was tightening abortion restrictions while Congress passed that amendment.


5 posted on 09/28/2020 12:07:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Like Trump, Amy Barrett has all the right enemies.


6 posted on 09/28/2020 12:12:00 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Have they started having the Two Minutes Hate yet?


7 posted on 09/28/2020 12:12:46 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it illegal to be pro-life?


8 posted on 09/28/2020 12:14:22 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well, here it comes. Every day will be filled with this crap until she is confirmed. Eventually Collins or Romney or other RINO POS will become doubtful and ask for an investigation. Just vote her up or down on the Senate floor tomorrow. This should be new confirmation schedule:
7:00 a.m. - 7:15 a.m. (yes, working people are working that early) Subcommitee Vote.
7:17 - 7:32 Procedural votes on senate floor
7:33 a.m - 7:48 am - Senate Floor Vote.
8:00 a.m. President Trump announces confirmation and ACB is sworn in.
9 posted on 09/28/2020 12:15:20 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength." - George Orwell, 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The signatories condemn Barrett for belonging to “the Notre Dame chapter of the anti-choice group University Faculty for Life” and argue that the Federalist Society would only approve a nominee who “is willing to overturn or seriously curtail Roe v. Wade.”

And?


10 posted on 09/28/2020 12:15:45 PM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rhodes College is one of the most liberal colleges in the South, a perfect little liberal arts school for rich young men and women where they can meet and marry someone of their own social class.


11 posted on 09/28/2020 12:18:09 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“...despite the respect that many of us hold for her intellect, and even the friendship that many of us held or continue to hold with her, we are firmly and passionately opposed to her nomination.”

Sheesh. With friends like these...


12 posted on 09/28/2020 12:19:56 PM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

RE: Rhodes College is one of the most liberal colleges in the South

That is would allow a pro-life group to exist on campus means that there’s still hope for this school.

What about Norte Dame, where ACB got her law degree? It’s supposed to be one of America’s foremost Catholic Universities...


13 posted on 09/28/2020 12:20:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sorority sisters on a Catholic university campus came out against her for being pro-life. Some “sisters!”


14 posted on 09/28/2020 12:25:16 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

Rhodes is Catholic?


15 posted on 09/28/2020 12:34:07 PM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

I was shocked tbe Notre Dame faculty all wrote in support of her.


16 posted on 09/28/2020 12:35:19 PM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

but in a 2013 Texas Law Review article, she said: “a justice’s duty is to the Constitution” and therefore it would be legitimate to strike down a precedent in conflict with the Constitution.


Their fundamental opposition to her, is that she can read, and she is likely to rule in accordance with the Constitution.


17 posted on 09/28/2020 12:36:04 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I smell some book deals in the works.


18 posted on 09/28/2020 12:39:06 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Thanks To Biden Voters Oregon Is Now A Battleground State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“despite the respect that many of us hold for her intellect, and even the friendship that many of us held or continue to hold with her, we are firmly and passionately opposed to her nomination ready to stab her in the back and flush that friendship down the tube.
19 posted on 09/28/2020 12:55:15 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Does the left like anything about America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As predictable as the sunrise/sunset.


20 posted on 09/28/2020 12:57:32 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (FILL THE SEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson