I do NOT see an “I will vote no” in there. She said “I don’t think we should vote”. I excepted her to say that
She would be incredibly foolish to vote no if there is a vote, libs already loathe her for voting for Kav. I don’t think she’s that stupid.
If indeed she finesses this, then she still has a shot at holding her senate seat
lol....she is..but now shes desperate as well
Untrue. She said that she was willing to MEET with Garland in 2016, not that she WOULD vote to confirm him. She's taking the exact same position in 2020 -- she is open to the Senate vetting a nominee, but doesn't think the vote should be held until after the election. I can't believe I'm defending this RINO, but her actions in 2016 and 2020 ARE consistent, and that's one of the few Senators I can say that about.
>> I do NOT see an “I will vote no” in there. She said “I don’t think we should vote”. I excepted her to say that She would be incredibly foolish to vote no if there is a vote, libs already loathe her for voting for Kav. I don’t think she’s that stupid. <<
Valid point. She said she feels the vote should be held after the election, not that she will vote no on a nominee if she's forced to vote now. I think its very unlikely she will actually vote against a GOP nominee unless its a Amy Coney Barrett type than the Dems can easily caricature as a "extremist" who is bonkers and "unfit" for SCOTUS.
As much as loathe Collins for being a back stabbing RINO, she's in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" position -- no matter what course she takes, its going to motivate tons of voters to "strike back" by voting against her in November.
I have far LESS faith in Lisa MurCOWski, I could see that witch joining the RATS in voting down even a non-controversial Trump judge just so she can get a pat on the head for it from the mainstream media. Romney would also likely pull something like that -- vote NO on ANY Trump judge just because the "timing" is wrong.