To: RightGeek
"I'm going to take Jack Dorsey's ass down," Wood told Fox News. "He has been abusing the First Amendment of this country for his own agenda." I'm sure I don't have to tell Lin Wood how wrong he is, but here goes.
The First applies to the fact the STATE cannot take away your right to free speech. But Twitter? Yeah. They can, and do, legally cancel your account.
6 posted on
09/02/2020 1:12:51 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
To: Responsibility2nd
“The First applies to the fact the STATE cannot take away your right to free speech. “
Actually, it says Congress ...
8 posted on
09/02/2020 1:18:09 PM PDT by
TexasGator
(Z1z)
To: Responsibility2nd
Two things:
1. It’s a public company.
2. It has internal and external policies it must consistently follow.
15 posted on
09/02/2020 1:53:45 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Dorsey is hiding behind his special protection of not being a content originator, which he shows is not the case by censoring comments.
Wood has a VERY strong case. VERY strong.
17 posted on
09/02/2020 1:57:08 PM PDT by
Montana_Sam
(Truth lives.)
To: Responsibility2nd
You think Lin Wood an’t get around that teensy problem?
To: Responsibility2nd
Has Twitter received federal funding?
Of any kind?
33 posted on
09/02/2020 5:02:32 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
To: Responsibility2nd
Yeah, go ahead and try to make the case that Lin Wood doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
38 posted on
09/03/2020 3:54:23 AM PDT by
gogeo
(It isn't just time to open America up again: It's time to be America again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson