Posted on 08/30/2020 4:47:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
In 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini became the Supreme Leader of Iran, riding in on a tremendous groundswell of public support. The Shah had been forced to flee for his life, Khomeini was welcomed back from exile in France as a national hero, and the Islamic Republic of Iran was born. Today, however, a new poll finds that “only 32% of the population consider themselves Shia Muslims.”
The poll was conducted by the Group for Analyzing and Measuring Attitudes in Iran (GAMAAN), described as “a non-profit institute in the Netherlands, asked Iranians about their ‘attitude toward religion.” The poll involved 50,000 Iranians.
According to the results, “78% of Iranians believe in God, but only 26% of them believe in ‘the coming of the Messiah (Imam Mahdi)’,” which is a major doctrine in Shia Islam.
Remarkably, “Half of the population used to believe but does not anymore and 6% have converted to a new religion."
“Out of 61% of the people born into religious families, 60% do not say their daily prayers. 68% of the participants believe that religion must not be the basis of legislation, 71% believe that religious institutions must be self-funded, and 42% believe that promoting any kind of religion must be banned from the public sphere.”
In short, the people are rejecting a strict Islamic theocracy, which has driven people away from the faith rather than consolidated them in their faith.
What makes this polling data so interesting is that the Iranian Revolution came from the bottom up, meaning, it was the people, led by the Muslim clergy, which toppled the iron-handed, very-secular Shah.
While Khomeini was still in exile in France, his weekly teachings were recorded, duplicated on cassette tapes, and smuggled into Iran, where the clergy preached these same messages in the mosques on Fridays. And the people, revolting against the growing worldliness and anti-religious sentiments in their nation, toppled the regime, welcoming back the austere Khomeini.
As for Khomeini himself, Hamid Algar wrote in 1981 that, “Given the current fame of Imam Khomeini as a revolutionary leader who has achieved a rare degree of success in the purely political sphere, it may appear surprising that he first gained fame as a writer and teacher concerned with devotional and even mystical matters.”
So, Khomeini began his career as a popular, spiritual teacher. But in his mind, the spiritual intersected with the secular and the political.
As Algar explained, “For Imam Khomeini, however, spirituality and mysticism have never implied social withdrawal or political quietism, but rather the building up of a fund of energy that finds its natural expression on the socio-political plane. The life of Imam Khomeini is a clear indication that the Revolution wrought by Islam necessarily begins in the moral and spiritual realm.”
What, then, can Christian conservatives in America learn from the state of affairs in Iran?
First, changing government leaders and changing laws is important, but changing hearts is much more important. Otherwise, if change is primarily enforced from the outside rather than produced on the inside, there will be a massive backlash. The end will be worse than the beginning.
That’s why I have emphasized repeatedly that we must put spiritual activity before political activity. As I tweeted on May 12, “If only we were as passionate about prayer as we are about politics! The nation would be rocked almost overnight and our own lives would be transformed.”
This is not a matter of either-or. It is a matter of emphasis, of putting first things first. By all means, we should work to change the laws where those laws are unjust or destructive. But we should work much harder to change hearts.
Second, every generation of believers must have a fresh encounter with God. We learn this from the history of Israel, where the book of Joshua tells us that, “Israel served the LORD during the lifetime of Joshua and the lifetime of the elders who lived on after Joshua, and who had experienced all the deeds that the LORD had wrought for Israel” (Joshua 24:31). The next generation, which did not experience the Lord’s power and grace for itself, quickly fell away.
It is the same with the Church. Grandpa’s stories and Mother’s testimonies will only have relevance for the younger generation when those young people experience the reality of their parents’ and grandparents’ God. Traditions can be passed down. Living faith must be experienced.
Here too, if we do not get this right, there will be a revolt against God and the Christian faith. After all, how many people want strict morals and high standards of living without a personal encounter with the Lord?
Third, contrary to the theocratic worldview of Islam, in which the Muslim faith takes over and rules, enforcing and even coercing adherence, the New Testament method is very different. We are to preach the gospel, declaring God’s love in the power of the Spirit, and as people are born-anew and transformed, they begin to lead different lives.
Their values change. Their perspectives change. Their goals change. Their standards change. As a result, the world around them changes.
Within the Church, as Christians start living like Christians, taking seriously the call of Jesus, they begin to shine their light more brightly. And that, in turn, touches the surrounding world in a positive way, drawing more non-believers to the faith while also confronting the social ills of the day.
This is how we fight our battles. And this is what I refer to as gospel-based, moral and cultural, Jesus revolution.
So, while we should stay involved politically, especially during this critical election season, we must put our priorities in the right place. Otherwise, while making temporary political gains, we will further alienate the next generation.
For some years now, dating back well before the rise of Donald Trump, young people have been turning away from God. And yet these same young people are hurting deeply today.
Let us bring to them the message of life, the message of hope, and the message of transformation – all of it found in Jesus. Politics cannot do this, nor can other religions, like Islam.
It is the gospel truth that sets people free.
I was in college with a too large number of Iranian students. They were protesting all the time. When the Shah fell and the Ayatollah took over, they were in shock. I talked privately with one of them and said, “This is what you wanted. Why are you upset?” He said, (approximately) “We wanted freedom, not this a$$hole.” I said, “When you guys were protesting, I always thought that if the Shah fell this is what would happen. How is it that you thought otherwise?” He just shook his head and said something like, “But we all wanted the same thing.”
In my opinion, none of the students had any idea how anything worked, not electricity, not airplanes and, especially, not politics. In the most literal sense, they believed in magic; saying something made it true, believing hard in something made it happen, etc. It was as if we had plucked people from the ninth century and dropped them into the modern world. I don’t think that’s the case for modern Iran. But they are still commanded by people who are more at home in the ninth century than the twenty-first.
The pallets of cash flown to Iran by the Obama Admin ( conveniently split up into Dollars, Swiss Francs and Euro's) were robbed for bribes and kick backs to American and EU politicians and their cronies just like our foreign aid to the Ukraine was. Our political elite sold Iran the key to becoming a nuclear power and sold America out in the process.
A lot of protesting Iranian students back then were communists, or communist leaning. The Tudeh Party was in bed with the mullahs because they had a common enemy- the Shah. After the revolution the Islamists turned on the commies and the reds lost the power struggle.
Islam is not a religion. It’s an ideology of conquest. The Koran and related texts provide justification for invading neighboring countries, murdering the populations, and stealing their wealth.
The Koran then establishes its own political, economic and legal system to ensure retention of power by the elites. Harems were created with the abduction of pretty Christian in their European raids. Islam has no tolerance for any other organizational principle. That’s why communism cannot survive in Islam. It is also the reason that Islamists cannot be absorbed into a representative republic. Sharia is completely incompatible with SHARIAH.
THERE IS NO ROOM FOR COMPROMISE. AND WE SHOULDN’T EITHER!!!
Revolution always eats its children. E.g. in Russia after destroying monarchist, then the constitutional democrats. Then all the leftists - Esers, Mensheviks, Makhno, Petliura etc. were eliminated one by one. Finally Stalin exterminated almost all the Bolsheviks themselves!
You could see this starting even here with the attacks on leftists majors (Portland, Chicago, Seattle, etc.)
My advice to would be revolutionaries - you better be in the winning fraction or you would be eliminated by your buddies. Your buddies are going to treat you a lot worse then your enemies ever did!
“That’s why I have emphasized repeatedly that we must put spiritual activity before political activity.”
That’s all good and fine when the other side plays by the same rules. At this point, running into churches and praying against the Democrats won’t quite cut it.
The FIRST THING we have to do is make DAMN SURE that this bunch of Democrats DOES NOT get political power over us, because if they do, nothing else will matter (ask people who lived under Stalin or Mao, or even China today, if you don’t believe me). After that, with religious freedom is assured, then I’m good with the article.
So, when I see something like this, this close to the election, it almost seems like a DNC attempt to convince us to disengage and hand the country over to Nancy, Chuck, and whoever replaces Biden.
“A lot of protesting Iranian students back then were communists, or communist leaning. The Tudeh Party was in bed with the mullahs because they had a common enemy- the Shah. After the revolution the Islamists turned on the commies and the reds lost the power struggle.”
Yep, there wasn’t a whole lot of good that came out of that ‘revolution’, but that was one of the better things!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.