no. the three lines are not the same, and the thoughts are not original or inciteful.
save the plagerism for when he actually quotes people withoutattribution. like repeating his own 2008 speech.
Those three lines could be formed by taking a three antonyms from a thesaurus and placing “more powerful than” between them. I would not call it plagiarism, but it shows a media unable to resist sucking his you-know-what.