[ClearCase_guy]

My opinion is that she isn’t. But my opinion doesn’t matter.
There are a lot of opinions on this topic and everybody says “I’m right, here’s why …” and none of that matters.

What we need is a Supreme Court decision on what the Constitution means by Natural Born Citizen. Until that happens, it’s very hard to say “So-and-so isn’t eligible.”

[TnTnTn]

She probably isn’t qualified constitutionally but she is definitely not qualified in other manner...not that it matters anymore....the favorites morph around and it seem Susan rice and whitmore are current front runners...

[Cboldt]

In Cruz's case, we have SCOTUS in Rogers v. Bellei (1971). Applied to Cruz, he was automatically naturalized by statute. No naturalization ceremony required, Congress chooses the extent and content of naturalization ritual and process. This varies depending on the circumstances attending the Congressional grant of citizenship.

Bellei had his citizenship stripped for failure to complete the citizenship requirements then in the statute. This statutory stripping mechanism could not work but for the fact that Bellei was a naturalized citizen.

The anchor baby situation lacks this sort of judicial clarity, not that judicial clarity means anything.

[Secret Agent Man]

Well roberts wont help make the right decision

thats the only thing you can be sure of