May the wheels of justice grind fine.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Only if he doesn’t throw it.
The minute it leaves his hand, it becomes assault, attempted murder, or arson.
2 posted on
07/16/2020 5:38:00 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
3 posted on
07/16/2020 5:38:00 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Arson and the threat of arson has always been a special kind of heinous crime too because of the potential to destroy civilization if you just let people burn things down.
4 posted on
07/16/2020 5:38:28 PM PDT by
Advil000
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Next it’ll be pointing a pistol at a cop’s head is protected by the First Amendment.
5 posted on
07/16/2020 5:38:56 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Was it a “mostly peaceful’ Molotov cocktail?
6 posted on
07/16/2020 5:42:19 PM PDT by
Nateman
(If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The only way one could argue that lighting a Molotov cocktail was indeed free speech, is if the speaker proceeded to stuff said lit cocktail down the front of his or her pants. That way, the symbolic nature of the lighting would be shown, and would not be considered arson. Otherwise, 10 to 25 in Federal prison.
7 posted on
07/16/2020 5:43:03 PM PDT by
Richard Axtell
(So, everything has gone to hell, what did I tell ya?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Openly carrying a weapon is strong, protected, political speech.
Tossing a molotov is like firing a gun. It is no longer symbolic.
In some certain instances it might be. But during a violent riot.. not so much.
9 posted on
07/16/2020 5:43:37 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ok, So douse him in lighter fluid and light his ass up in the name of Free Speech!!!
10 posted on
07/16/2020 5:44:09 PM PDT by
eyeamok
To: E. Pluribus Unum
he actually tossed the firebomb on the street near Bet he was always the last kid picked for a team in gym class
13 posted on
07/16/2020 5:45:28 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(Youth, and speed can always be overcome with experience and treachery.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Glad the guy is acknowledging his actions. Guilty. Twenty years at hard labor. Bailiff, call the next case.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Eugene Ohm, Mr. Paces lawyer at the federal public defenders office”
Yeah, I don’t think we have a whole lot to worry about if he couldn’t find a better mouthpiece than this.
15 posted on
07/16/2020 5:46:29 PM PDT by
decal
(I'm not rude, I don't suffer fools is all.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
But, but...the First Amendment was part of a document written and ratified by dead, white slave owners.
17 posted on
07/16/2020 5:52:51 PM PDT by
RAldrich
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So, if we tarred and feathered this snowflake and then threw him into the river, that would be considered Free Speech?
20 posted on
07/16/2020 6:12:33 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Why does NIKE support child slavery?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The only way that defense would work is if the cocktail was filled with a non-flammable liquid.
21 posted on
07/16/2020 6:12:44 PM PDT by
Ronin
(White privilege is not having to fake your own hate crimes. (HT: CrappieLuck))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Shooting a man with a fire bomb in his hand is protected by the 2nd Amendment. :)
22 posted on
07/16/2020 6:15:19 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Covid is over. We have been conditioned by it. The Cultural Revolution has begun.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
23 posted on
07/16/2020 6:16:08 PM PDT by
Fedora
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Where does Jarrett Jeremy Pace live? Asking for several friends.
24 posted on
07/16/2020 6:17:54 PM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This guy is not an outlier. This thought process is solid Del.
25 posted on
07/16/2020 6:18:20 PM PDT by
Fido969
(In!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It must be in there right next to the right to privacy.
26 posted on
07/16/2020 6:20:21 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(I trust President Trump.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How appropriate for a member of the resistance to have a lawyer named Ohm.
27 posted on
07/16/2020 6:21:42 PM PDT by
damper99
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson