Posted on 07/14/2020 7:13:38 AM PDT by SJackson
Does one more diatribe against Israel published by The New York Times matter?
In recent years, the Times has had an open-door policy for those who oppose not just the policies of the Israeli government but also the whole idea of a Jewish state. So the publication last week of a piece by Atlantic columnist Peter Beinart explaining “Why I No Longer Believe in a Jewish State” — and opting for a single nation of both Arabs and Jews, instead of a two-state solution — didn’t really break new ground.
What’s important, though, about Beinart’s decision to switch from self-proclaimed liberal Zionist critic of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to advocate for, in effect, dismantling Israel is that support for his article isn’t confined to the usual far-left suspects who oppose the Jewish state’s existence.
Key Democratic foreign-policy operatives like Obama Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes and former Clinton and Obama State Department official Robert Malley tweeted their support for Beinart’s bravery and thoughtfulness as well as the importance of the discussion he’s trying to initiate.
Rhodes and Malley are typical of the sort of people who may well be in control of US foreign policy come January if former Vice President Joe Biden wins the presidency. If they think the unimaginable prospect of a 72-year-old vibrant and successful nation surrendering and allowing itself to be transformed into a “binational” entity rather than the sole Jewish state on the planet is worth discussing, then something ominous is percolating inside the liberal foreign-policy establishment that will be handed the reins of government if President Trump loses in November.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
..................
Needless to say the Dem position is that Israel has no say in the matter. Nor do non terror supporting Arabs.
Through Palestinian Eyes – Zvi Yechezkeli and the hidden camera
Of course if they vote correctly, domestic terrrorists will get a say.
Watch: Pro-Palestinian BLM Rallies in U.S. Call for ‘Death to Israel, Death to America’
and you think Israel would not eliminate Democrat Leaders
Just wait for Peter Beinart’s next column: “The Final Solution”
Never again, eh?
Translation:
Death to Israel.
That’s been the operational slogan since 1947.
These are the same people who thought the Muslim Brotherhood should be given a chance to run Egypt and other countries. They nearly caused a genocide against Christian Copts. These people caused the ongoing problems in Libya and Syria, and caused the greatest refugee / immigrant flow in Europe since WWII.
I want to say they are disconnected from reality and living in a fantasy world, but then trying to implement their fantasies will have terrible real-world consequences.
And actually happened to Jews during WWII. Lest we not forget.
Obamacare was supposed to be the Final Solution for the unborn and the elderly...
Israel is already a “binational” entity with Jews and Arabs. The change that they’re proposing to make leads inevitably, quickly, and violently, to the elimination of Jews from that equation.
“Palestine”, as currently constituted, is theoretically an entity consisting of Muslims, Christians and Jews. How’s that working out?
My liberal Jewish friends, who I spent a year in Israel with, are all for a single state. They hate Trump and Netanyahu and thought the move of the Embassy to Jerusalem was a bad faith move by Trump to designate the Palestinians as nothing more than second class citizens.
I’m a Jew and I hate Jewish people. If you don’t know the difference, please ask me and I will be more than happy to explain.
From what I have read and heard, most Democrats in the US would like to see Israel wiped out and all the Jews killed, which is the PLO Charter. It seems radical Islam, which is like Fascism, has permeated the Democrat party. It’s a shame, but prophetic
End of Israel? Be a lot of mushroom clouds first.
Unlike the Nazis, Democrats are very good at disguising their true intent but still hinting at it using code words and vague terms. A one-state solution supposedly means a state where Arabs and Jews live together in peace. But everyone knows or should know that that is impossible. It would mean genocide. That’s the true intent of Democrats.
Atlantic columnist Peter Beinart explaining “Why I No Longer Believe in a Jewish State” ... Obama Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes and former Clinton and Obama State Department official Robert Malley tweeted their support...
Should poll Farrakhan's NFL stooges, as well as Nick Cannon.
The DNC party machine was taken kvetch by Soroznazi and his gang Years ago already. The D party is not going to recover as long as they run it.
And don’t forget the intent to import 4-6 million Arabs from neighboring states. Of course, none of this will happen, Israel still gets a say.
Since 1950 Christian population has declined from 15% to 2%, so not so well for Christians. Don't know how many Jews lived in the areas under palestinian authority before the 1948 war, but after, is was zero.
Democrats haven’t changed since they openly wore swastikas on their SS uniforms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.