[heterosupremacist]

The author is right, so he must be a far Right white supremacist who advances conspiracy theories to help wicked Republicans oppress black folks in particular, and ‘progressives’ in general.

Isn’t that obvious? Hmm...

[Texas Eagle]

Written by an actual doctor. A brave one. Pray he doesn’t get backlash.

[Texas Eagle]

I didn’t realize those who tested for the antibodies was categorized as a new case. That’s why I have been harping on the “recovered” cases. Such a person should be added to the number number of recovered cases, not “new”.

[politicianslie]

There is a NY doctor who has shown there is a nearly 100% effective treatment for the Chinese virus.

Dr. Zelenko, a NY doctor whose team has treated 2200 infected Chinese virus patients. Only two of those patients have died, one had cancer and was on chemo, the second was very elderly and very sick when he started the drug treatment combination.

YOUTUBE Dr. Zelinko talks about his drug combo that is nearly 100% effective in saving people with the Chinese virus

If you watch the whole presentation on Rudy Giuliani's PODCAST or YOUTUBE channel, you will see that Zelinko uses Trump's malaria drug, Zinc and a drug to fight secondary infections.

Rudy had two friends who were infected. When they visited other doctors, the patient showing symptoms was tested, the results were sent out and two to three days later, the patient was told of the test results!

That two to three day wait is KILLING patients unnecessarily. Zelenko starts treating patients as soon as they report to him. He tests them but instead of sending them home for the virus to have more time to attack it's host, Zelinko gives them the malaria drug combination with the goal of keeping them out of the hospital.

Watch for Dr. Fauxi to attack this information as anecdotal. We must do testing to determine if HCQ is safe and effective! Until testing determines efficacy, Fauci will be in favor of letting people die rather than give them the Trump malaria drug combo. I will NOT place the sarcasm tag here.

[semimojo]

Now the rules have changed with a new “probable case” definition of those in contact with a confirmed or probable case, with symptoms. Suppose my neighbor tested positive for COVID, perhaps tested so he could return to work after having cold symptoms. If I have a new cough at the same time, I am a presumed positive case. If my kids have a sore throat, they are also presumed positive cases.

This guy's being disingenuous.

Texas HHS states prominently on their website: Probable cases are not included in the total case numbers.

The author's trying to deceive you into thinking the case rate's being inflated by a factor of 17.

Why would he do that? Why would an author so disrespect the intelligence of his readers?

Ah, perhaps the pay-per-click model of American Thinker.

[Taxman]

Ping!