Different standards for different Presidents.
Yep, like the entire establishment top to bottom. The deep state is another cult.
John Roberts is not fit to be a traffic court judge.
Obamacare WAS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.
DACA is NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.
YOU DECIDE what presidents are being singled out....
he subjects of DACA brought here illegally by their illegal alien parents are all ‘subject to a foreign jurisdiction’, namely, their countries of origin. Although they have access to general protection of our laws, their countries’ foreign counsels represent them outside their countries of origin.
So WTH is SCOTUS doing even looking at the case? The justices have no jurisdiction to affect DACA recipients, from a Constitutional basis. The Immigration Courts, under the Executive branch, deal with foreigners. This ruling should be blatantly ignored by President Trump.
This should be part of a Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement bill, missing since 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -
1) southern barrier;
2) require eVerify to hire;
3) end all chain migration;
4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural parents);
5) end work visas;
6) 10-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (40 years to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population);
7) Set up an illegal aliens’ victim restitution fund.
Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls.
Patriots need to elect a new patriot Congress that will not only promise to fully support PDJT’s already excellent work for MAGA, but will also promise to impeach and remove Constitution-ignoring liberal justices from the bench.
DACA was never legal.
Obama had no authority to do it, said so himself numerous times.
The Supreme Court has upheld that which was never legal.
Say goodbye to the rule of law.
So after all is said and done, how does the President proceed? It seems at every turn someone, somewhere, does whatever they can to prevent him from doing what is right.
This is an opinion, and one that argues that breaking the law by illegal entry and abetting said illegal acts by unconstitutionally ignoring enforcement of that law together make it right.
Two wrongs cannot make a right, no matter how much the author likes the outcome.
Not really. Obama created a new rule by EO.
Trump tried to *change* that rule, EO.
To change requires compliance with Administrative Procedure Act. There are mandatory steps to follow. Trump’s lawyers failed him again (e.g. Muslim ban, build the wall, all the litigation they blow or take a dive on - due to many of them are Deep State and sabateurs themselves).
Trump can start the APA compliance all over and do it right and the courts would not stop or overturn it.
This was a raw political decision by the court 5-4, except CJ Roberts who played it straight on the law, and he is catching too much hell over it.
Roberts enabled obamacare. He could have helped Trump with DACA and decided not to. No politics. Right.
Based on some other stories I have seen, I am beginning to wonder about Roberts.
Roberts is a scumbag.
Sounds like this discrepancy should be sent for a review by the supreme c.... o..... u... r... t? nevermind.
Keep submiting executive orders for the same purpose. just change some of the words. Make them review all of the orders. After a few thousand maybe they will get the hint.
SCOTUS went off the rails long ago. Another arm of deep state snakes.
Wait, I read right here this was a secret victory for Trump and Roberts is really a Trump supporter, no really I did. Even when Roberts approved ObamaCare it was a secret victory, no really it was.