Posted on 05/27/2020 12:22:09 PM PDT by RandFan
What is to say that Trump loses the election in November and a new court upholds the virtues of Facebook, Twitter, and Google? Then they can regulate the media to their platform.
The legislation is not needed or required. It is a slippery slope. If we can regulate those companies by fiat (sic?) then what is to say that OAN and Rush Limbaugh cannot regulate as well?
There is a legal difference between a platform and a publisher. A platform is simply a method of distribution. Anyone who uses it is solely responsible for the content. A publisher, on the other hand, is taking responsibility for the content they publish and makes editorial decisions accordingly.
The difference is important: platforms are immune from lawsuits for defamation because they hold no responsibility for the content on their platform. Publishers are not immune because they are the ones deciding what gets published.
This is not new legislation, it’s recognition of a decision that firms like Twitter have made: they decided to become publishers. Remove the legal protections they had as platforms and put them into the same legal category as newspapers and networks.
Hearing rumors around DC that Trump is preparing an Executive Order THIS WEEK to stop censorship by Big Tech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.