[billyboy15]

There will only be another lock down if the American people allow it.

My guess is they will not.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Chinese having another problem with another outbreak of this virus which has mutated. It’s in the northeast part of the country and along the border with North Korea (which has far worse problems than they’ve admitted).

[chris37]

I agree.

Enough.

[SaxxonWoods]

My county stats:

Total cases: 53
Hospitalizations: 0
Deaths: 0

Recovered: 53

[Socon-Econ]

The data about this disease is in. It’s not dangerous enough to justify the hysteria. Quarantine the infected and the vulnerable; but let everyone else get on with their lives. For those who are gullible enough to believe that masks will protect them without causing their own problems, let them continue to wear them voluntarily.

[Texas Eagle]

As long as people are stupid enough to vote for demonicRATS and trust the Fake News Media, there will be lockdowns. They’re like a dog that has tasted blood for the first time.

[SaxxonWoods]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/i-was-right-says-prof-who-predicted-pandemic-would-play-itself-out-in-70-days/?utm_source=whatfinger

“I was right, says prof who predicted pandemic would play itself out in 70 days”

[frank ballenger]

Except for avowed atheists who don’t pray, the Dems are praying for people to get infected and die from Covid in order to hurt President Trump and his supporters.

They are cheering on the wall to wall coverage of how horrible the contagion is about to become if business and professional workplaces are opened again.

Please remember that when you start to feel any tolerance toward the Dems in your environment. I feel more and more like Frank Capra in that wonderful series of films “Why We Fight.”

[Georgia Girl 2]

This thing is going to go the way of Zika and West Nile.

[daniel1212]

Again,, why the fixation in the H.K. flu of 68 when the Asian flu pandemic of 1957-1958 resulted in a estimated 116,000 deaths in America (followed by the Hong Kong flu with about est. 100,000 American deaths in 1968–69), when at about 173,000,000, the population size in 57-58 was close to half of what it is now (330,541,000, rounded figures). Meaning that not only was the infection death rate much higher than for COVID-19, but there would have to be about 200,000 COVID-19 est. deaths to be comparable to the Asian flu. Yet that would simply make it basically equal as concerns the numbers of deaths in proportion to population size, but to justify the "CovidCaptivity," one would have to argue that the Asian flu should have necessitated a response like that to COVID-19. The Soviets would have favored that for sure.

The question then is, where was the COVID-19 comparative response in 57-58 in proportion to its threat? Yes, the 116,000 deaths in America to the Asian flu was for the whole year, yet even if we reach about 200,000 deaths (we pray not) for COVID-19 then that type of equality would still mean that the extremely restrictive all-ages long-term response to COVID-19 simply has no precedent in American history, except to a degree with the far more deadly (550,000 to 675,000 Americans, or 0.66% of the population) 1918 flu.

And yet we read ,