The only reason it isn’t treason is that it isn’t in consort with an enemy country.
What was done is in fact sedition. It is not criminbal sedition, only becuase it was done without advocating or using violence. But is sedition, bigtime.
Non-violent sedition. Shadow government, do all possible to topple and destabilize the elected government.
Just because it isn’t a crime, doesn’t mean it is acceptable.
people died,
it is criminal
They were working with Russia and a number of other countries.
I wouldn’t call Red China a friendly country.
For discussion:
U.S. Constitution - Article 3 Section 3
Article 3 - The Judicial Branch
Section 3 - Treason
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Really, what is China? We were taken over by a communist enemy. You just have not faced it yet.
“It is not criminbal sedition, only becuase it was done without advocating or using violence.”
.... i disagree. It was done with the threat of violence, as their actions were under the color f law, which implies the power to inflict violence via arrest and imprisonment, and if you resist their efforts, deadly force.
You are absolutely correct in pointing out that what was done is not acceptable even if not falling within a particular criminal statute. This likely explains the libs on the Supreme Court joining the majority in the Bridgegate decision. They saw the next step knowing how bad. Zero and his cronies had been, at least enables their escape on treason charges.
Focus should be on RICO.