[libertylover]

The court argued that because police believed that her husband (who according to Rodriguez did not have access to her firearms) could pose a threat to public safety, firearms that had been seized from their home when her husband was taken into custody under a mental health hold did not have to be returned to her.

If they allow this it's scary because they could seize the firearms of someone whose crazy liberal sister-in-law says your 3rd cousin, twice removed, might pose a threat to public safety, yada, yada, yada...

[Captain7seas]

“If they allow this it’s scary because they could seize the firearms of someone...”

Already happened in Florida. Fish camp owner Rick Rawlings was losing his business that had been in operation for a couple generations. State came in and established a No Wake, Idle Speed Zone on the St. Johns River for miles in each direction to protect the West Indian Manatee. He fought it for years, then fed up and on the verge of losing his business started disregarding it. He was cited so much he wound up with a Felony conviction. Its my understanding that his wife was prohibited from having a firearm in the house also.