“Because whatever the numbers end up being, it would be much worse without the lockdown.”
What are you saying? Is it worth ANY price, any amount of DESTRUCTION to the HUGE majority of peoples lives by way of economic catastrophe to MAYBE save the lives of some people who have health issues anyway? Ruining the lives of maybe 100,000,000 people (financially) for what?
People dying from the regular flu and no one reports on this....why?
Italy....ITALY now reporting just 12%...TWELVE PERCENT of reported China Virus deaths can be attributed to this Virus....12% which means a FULL 88% can as easily be attributed to the underlying health issues ALL the dead had (not to mention the average age of these people was OVER 80 yrs)
Purely a media driven panic for purely ideological reasons.
Not worth any price, but I hardly think 100,000,000 lives will be financially ruined. That’s fearmongering.
I see reports about people dying from the flu several times every year. Can’t drive down the road without reminders to get a flu shot. We just see it so often, we become insensitive to it.
I care about 80 year olds. I hope to be one someday.
$10 trillion spent and 100,000 deaths works out to an even hundred million dollars spent per death. We’re already at $6 trillion so 10 seems totally doable. That’s of course not counting the trillions in self inflected carnage being caused by the Wu Flu Panic. Far more will die of that than ever get a bad case of the Wu Flu.
The numbers will be padded here, as well, because we’ve already declared the US gov’t is picking up the tab $$ on WuFlu cases. No insurance Co or hospital wants to be left holding the financial bag, so will put death WITH WuFlu in column of deaths FROM WuFlu