Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grayboots

Sondland created a mess with his assumptions, but I must have missed actual wrongdoing on his part.

That said, he serves at the pleasure of the President as a representative of that President.


19 posted on 02/07/2020 4:05:13 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

Sondland was trying to save his bacon. His initial testimony was favorable to POTUS. He was obviously threatened with financial ruin for himself and his wife’s business if he did not play ball for Team Impeachment.


49 posted on 02/07/2020 4:11:16 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
I must have missed actual wrongdoing on his part

Making a mess with his assumptions!

73 posted on 02/07/2020 4:15:54 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Kill-googl,TWTR,FCBK,NYT,WaPo,Hwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antfa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

His wrong doing was to pass his assumptions on to others as factual information from the President. He obviously did not qualfy his “information” as his assumptions but indicated to those with whom he spoke that those were the wishes of the President. I call that wrong doing.


81 posted on 02/07/2020 4:19:05 PM PST by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

Sondland outright said....when asked was there a quid pro quo, in his summary......YES! He said..


89 posted on 02/07/2020 4:21:20 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

I agree. Gordon D. Sondland was far from the worst. He was mostly confused, inept and out of his depth. He was from the private sector, a big donor.... IIRC to the Trump inauguration committee. His reward was this ambassadorship. IOW he was not a careerist in gov’t like snake Vindman who got the heave ho today.


128 posted on 02/07/2020 4:38:46 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

I watched his testimony and his “assumptions” as you fairly characterized them indirectly formed the basis for his testimony based on nothing more this his supposition.

I was dumbfounded that such a person would be in that position to begin with - I guess he donated a lot of money. He did not come across as very bright to be charitable and I found his testimony to be “shady” (my own term). The most amusing thing about him was that when he was questioned by Schiff and Co. in private he must have been far more certain than he was in the open hearing facing cross-examination. Schiff looked very frustrated with him numerous times.

I had no confidence in him based on his own testimony and I am not surprised that Trump is letting him go - he serves at the pleasure of the President. Bye.


191 posted on 02/07/2020 6:44:48 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
When you are the personal representative of the president, and you deliberately make damaging and distorted assumptions about his intentions and policies, that is worse than “wrongdoing.” It Is malfeasance in office, insubordination, and cause for dismissal.
312 posted on 02/11/2020 9:42:00 PM PST by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered tha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson