So you finally admit you didn’t read it and just posted your self-gratifying boilerplate condemnation, making believe you actually mattered to the discussion.
What you posted had absolutely nothing to do with the content of the article.
Makes you irrelevant.
Maybe you should just skip over articles you can’t be bothered with rather than clogging up threads with your trash posts. Your unilateral declaration that certain words in an article’s title make that article meaningless and your willingness to immediately use ad hominem attacks on people that disagree with you reeks of narcissism. I tried to gently point out to you that hypotheses in general and this one on particular are properly expressed in words like “may” “could”, etc., but you’re so stuck on your preconceptions that you simply reject other peoples ideas out of hand without even looking at them. Good luck with that for the rest of your life. You would have been one of the guys clamoring for Jesus’ crucifixion. He would have been way too radical for you.
It’s really quite sad.
Good bye.
So you admit that “...may not...” is the criteria you go by to forum your opinions?
I go by “didn’t”, “could not have”...
You chum feeders need to up your dietary requirements.
Yep, that’s some incredibly scientific evidence there.
As I have been saying, you poor thing.
I’m actually beginning to feel sorry for you.
This is going to ruin your whole day.
My initial post all over again.
- - -
Whew!
may not
could be
might be
models project
guestimates are
- - -
Did I make a critique of the content.
No.
Were you free to read it yourself? Sure.
You’re a bit slow aren’t you.
And you wonder why I kind of laugh at you?