I'm doing just fine here. When a title has the word may in it, it's not worth reading. It telegraphs from the get-go that what follows may not be definitive.
As I stated before, if the folks who came up with this can't say something definitively, it's just not worth reading.
I know you wish to avoid that fact. That's okay. Spend you time in the land of make believe if you like.
Ta ta...
BTW: demoncRats love to make believe, project also...
So you finally admit you didn’t read it and just posted your self-gratifying boilerplate condemnation, making believe you actually mattered to the discussion.
What you posted had absolutely nothing to do with the content of the article.
Makes you irrelevant.
Maybe you should just skip over articles you can’t be bothered with rather than clogging up threads with your trash posts. Your unilateral declaration that certain words in an article’s title make that article meaningless and your willingness to immediately use ad hominem attacks on people that disagree with you reeks of narcissism. I tried to gently point out to you that hypotheses in general and this one on particular are properly expressed in words like “may” “could”, etc., but you’re so stuck on your preconceptions that you simply reject other peoples ideas out of hand without even looking at them. Good luck with that for the rest of your life. You would have been one of the guys clamoring for Jesus’ crucifixion. He would have been way too radical for you.
It’s really quite sad.
Good bye.