I always like this reply: 
Posted on 01/27/2020 1:48:38 PM PST by SeekAndFind
He could remove Judges from hearing cases at all.
L
See, you can tell everyone I don’t argue with Everybody on the board.
As long as I agree with them almost 100 percent of the time, like I do with you :)
Honestly, working with 50 liberals when you’re the only conservative in a NYC office building may have unintended long term consequences. I fought valiantly for years and some even credited me on the side.
Alas, on some issues I might have been nudged a little a way from 100 percent right to maybe 75 percent right on some issues.
To my shame.
With what authority?
Thanks for your insight. I know nothing about legal matters, but have a slight fraction of a clue about the Constitution.
“With what authority?”
Chief Justice of SCOTUS. Who’s going to sue and on what grounds?
L
I always like this reply:
My ancestors came to Virginia in the early 1700’s, they were deported from England as Welsh criminals.
Good way for the Crown to get free labor, until they all ran off to what was to become West (by GAWD) Virginia.
(snicker, snicker)
My ancestor a Rankin was in the revolutionary war. They settled in what became WV. I was born in logan
A couple black-robed tyrants “allows” Trump to enforce the law.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
That’s right!
I’m sure that must have been fun. After a while it does get old.
Kudos to you though.
I agree with you too. Did I ever tell you how intelligent I find you?
LOL
I love it. :)
I recall when every new immigrant came here to work, learn our ways/assimilate, plus they raised their kids to aim high. One of the finest men I ever knew was a West Point Captain. He was Class of 65. His father and his wife’s father were West VA. coal miners. Both of his sons graduated from our military academies. One from the USAF Academy and the younger son West Point, like his father. Those were the American dreams I recall.
I have to wonder why you guys still have Mullah Justin up there :(
In a future time when Democrats are in power they will likely seek to have all such 5-4 SCOTUS somehow retried or abrogated.
This is dumb and shouldn’t even be an issue. Real immigrants have to post a bond essentially, and/or have a current citizen as a sponsor. Why aren’t we going after those people?
Let the immigrant use up to three months of benefits, since, apparently, they need it that bad. But then bill / put a lien against whomever sponsored them! For the full cost of any benefits provided, plus 10% to cover admin costs, plus 100% as punitive charges since they shouldn’t be on public benefits AT ALL anyway.
Also, the fact that they had to use public benefits (and couldn’t even just live off their sponsor for a bit) means obviously they cannot support themselves, and don’t have the local support in these US. Send ‘em back!
Because Canadians are sick dogs that return to their vomit. Don’t know how douche bag Turd O won again.
IT IS ABOUT TIME!!!!!
The whole concept of “nationwide injunction” is ridiculous prima facie.
Finally, finally, the lower courts are going to be reined in, I sincerely hope.
Yeah, it’s is beyond time.
They’ve essentially become the tool of the Leftists.
What bothers both of us I’m sure, is that this wasn’t swatted down the first time it was tried.
We’re far too passive on things like this. (our leaders)
I’m sure those two sow-bellies on the SCOTUS will dissent. Of course Ginsberg too...
When did it change that you could become a public charge. My neighbor sponsored her husband to come to the U.S.
She told me a condition of his immigration was that she had to show ability to provide for his financial support and that he was no eligible for any social services for 10 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.