Why do I think this is half true? Wouldn’t they have to withdraw and resubmit?
Hmmm....OBSTRUCTION OF THE SUPREME COURT ... another article of impeachment. /sarc
You know if their needs to be a delay in getting something clearly unconstitutional until after the election, that means the Republicans have no plan! Here’s what Trump needs to do, kill the EO exempting them from their platinum coverage, and for them to get their own health care. Then tell them that this is what is going to happen
1.Insurance WILL be sold across state lines
2.Their WILL be a cap on medical lawsuits!
3.Their will not be socialist Medicare for all!
Hmmm...what will Roberts do? Slow it down, or speed it up?
That will tell us where he’s at, for sure.
A replacement is free enterprise and not gov’t interference that has raised the cost of medical care.
Republicans should have come up with a plan a hell of a long time ago.
What a crock. It’s amazing how many candidates want Medicare for all. That proves right there that Ovomitcare is an abject failure! Not a single republican will call them on it.
What a pathetic bunch of quislings.
The only rational “replacement” is simply no replacement and getting the federal government completely out of the health and insurance businesses and make it illegal for drug companies to sell their on-patent drugs at generic prices in other countries. One price only to be followed by heavy sanctions against foreign entities cloning the patent drugs. Prices of drugs would come down, even the on patent prices.
"On Dec. 18, [2019] the judges ruled 2-1 that the health insurance mandate was unconstitutional but that the rest of the law needed further analysis by the lower courts to see whether some parts could be separated out and others could not [emphasis added]."
Based on date of the article referenced below, it looks like it took the court roughly 7+ years (2019 - 2012) just to decide if individual mandate was unconstitutional. Corrections, insights welcome.
Obamacare's 2,700 pages are too much for justices (March 29, 2012)
The question is, are anti-PDJT justices willing to try to ram 2000+ page Obamacare through their constitutional verification process like misguided Speaker Pelosi rammed Obamacare through the House to try to possibly soften PDJT's 2020 record-breaking landslide?
Remember in November!
MAGA! KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)
The Deep State strikes again.
What it means is that President Trump would not be able to get the replacement through the house while the dems are still in charge.