Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Won’t change anything.

Blue states will continue to pass it.
Next time there is a Democrat POTUS a new AG will do a 180 and....presto.....stroke of the pen, 28th Amendment.


2 posted on 01/10/2020 11:03:41 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
This article is sloppy and contains some errors of fact.

The DOJ is correct and is simply enforcing a federal district court decision in NOW v. Idaho that declared the ratification window for the ERA expired in March 1979. Appeals to higher courts and the Supreme Court failed decades ago.

To revive the ERA, the Supreme Court would have to reverse its 1921 decision in Dillon v. Gloss and modify its 1939 decision in Coleman v. Miller. These two decisions form the backbone of the relationship between Congress and the amendatory process under Article V. Changing these decisions would throw the amendatory process into constitutional chaos, which is why the federal courts won't touch a state-initiated suit with a 10-foot pole.

The AG doesn't fit into the equation.

3 posted on 01/10/2020 11:06:47 AM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson