Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2020 4:53:15 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


The one that is to blame for all of this, is the peanut farmer from Georgia


2 posted on 01/06/2020 4:57:06 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Any of us who remember 1979 agree—it’s about damn time.


3 posted on 01/06/2020 4:57:25 AM PST by yldstrk (Bingo! We have a winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

6 posted on 01/06/2020 5:02:22 AM PST by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You can be sure that North Korea and China are watching this closely.

After seeing a terrorist vaporized like that, sensibly NK has scrapped their plans to launch an ICBM near the North American coast ...

amazing what a little guts will do ...


7 posted on 01/06/2020 5:09:10 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It was not an assassination.

1. Iran very clearly declared war on USA when the Ayatollah came to power. It’s an “inconvenient truth” that has been ignored.

2. While hostages were released-Iran Knew Reagan would act effectively and they needed time to get stronger.

3. More attacks such as 83 Marine Barracks and 96
Khobar Towers attacks-thanks to Iran.

4. Iran wages proxy wars throughout the world-against USA and others.

This guy was killed in country during the so called War on Terror—of which Iran just happens to be a sponsor of terror and that guy is a leader of terrorist attacks throughout the region.

BDT someone did something—Finally — no pale colors and wishy washy appeasements. POTUS wins in my book.


13 posted on 01/06/2020 5:35:55 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Iranian violence countered by U.S. and world diplomatic flatulence and appeasement

A more appropriate phrase you'll seldom find.

14 posted on 01/06/2020 5:43:27 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It goes back to the American Embassy Siege in Iran on November 4, 1979. That’s 40 years and a few weeks.


15 posted on 01/06/2020 5:46:42 AM PST by BuffaloJack ("Security does not exist in nature. Everything has risk." Henry Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Isn’t this what the Left wants? I remember back in the 60s when the war protesters and entertainment cabal thought the leaders should fight it out instead of sending their armies of young men to fight their wars. An offshoot of “What if they threw a war and nobody came?”


17 posted on 01/06/2020 6:03:48 AM PST by FrdmLvr (They never thought she would lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If there is a bully on your block do you give him all your toys and cringe and cry before him ‘don’t hit me’!

Or do you kick his legs out from under him and show him you’ll not submit to his will.


19 posted on 01/06/2020 6:32:54 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I wonder if the Ayatolla would agree - “The assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani is an unusual, possibly aberrant, event. The killing of this individual leader of a sovereign state may lead to all-out war between Iran and the U.S.” - that this guy was the individual leader of Iran...


21 posted on 01/06/2020 7:34:25 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We cannot wage this war in a defensive spirit. As our power and our resources are fully mobilized, we shall carry the attack against the enemy--we shall hit him and hit him again wherever and whenever we can reach him.

We must keep him far from our shores, for we intend to bring this battle to him on his own home grounds.

American armed forces must be used at any place in all the world where it seems advisable to engage the forces of the enemy. In some cases these operations will be defensive, in order to protect key positions. In other cases, these operations will be offensive, in order to strike at the common enemy, with a view to his complete encirclement and eventual total defeat.


23 posted on 01/06/2020 10:24:09 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson