Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 2010s Were a Terrible Decade for Housing Construction
Reason ^ | December 23, 2019 | Christian Britschgi

Posted on 01/01/2020 5:50:15 PM PST by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Wuli

“the prices are unaffordable.”

Starter homes are still affordable. The problem is the younger generation wants to live in their parent’s status.


21 posted on 01/02/2020 7:36:48 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“Starter homes are still affordable. The problem is the younger generation wants to live in their parent’s status.”

Not true, in terms of new construction. Most new construction is not “starter” homes, and the turn over of small older homes - which might be affordable, does not match the population increase of new high school and college graduates.

In the 1950s they built plenty of “starter homes”. I know, my parents bought such new homes, twice.

If back in the 1950s builders were mostly building what they mostly build today, my parents would not have been able to afford a new home. That level of building new affordable homes tapered off over the decades and has ceased. You can see it just in the trend of the average square foot size of new homes, which has increased by over 1,000 square feet in the last 42 years - from 1,660 square feet in 1973 to 2,687 square feet recently.


22 posted on 01/02/2020 7:51:56 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

I live in Denver. Lots of starter homes that have a monthly of around $1200. What kids want these days are the $450+ homes. They’ll pay $1,500 for a phone, $300 for blue jeans, $150,000 for a worthless college degree, but balk at saving $10,000 for a home unless it is a mansion.


23 posted on 01/02/2020 8:29:47 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“I live in Denver. Lots of starter homes that have a monthly of around $1200. What kids want these days are the $450+ homes. They’ll pay $1,500 for a phone, $300 for blue jeans, $150,000 for a worthless college degree, but balk at saving $10,000 for a home unless it is a mansion.”

I don’t know what kids those are. The average age of a first time home buyer is not kids right out of high school or college, it’s about 36 years old; that is someone with 12 to 18 years work experience. Millennials are not buying or having kids; they are renting doubled up or living with mom and dad; maybe by the time they are in their thirties they might have saved enough to buy a place. By the time my parents were 36 they already had five kids and were in the first home they had bought; and they were lower middle class.


24 posted on 01/02/2020 1:15:10 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson