“After more than two centuries of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant dominance, the United States has moved from being a majority-white Christian nation to one with no single racial and religious majority”
Dominance? So, a self defined nation is “dominant” but no longer...as if the United States were a place, not a people.
So when the land mass labeled “US” on maps becomes populated primarily by hispano-asian ethnics with a black african minority, what will it be like? Will still-white Russia worry about a polyglot tower of babel, unable to field a significant force? More importantly, will Chinese Commu-fascists fear anything about them?
We all know the answer: the “fundamental transformation” that Obama and the Rat party wanted will have done what they wanted...made the country into Brazil with nukes.
And who will own and control those arms? Why the sons of Mexico and China of course, not anyone whose ancestors fought in some tiny war in 1776.
And that, folks, is what this is all about. They wanted our power, and they realized we were vulnerable to invasion by immigration. So they did...
Read the details of the article. If white non-Hispanics have declined in actual numbers (not just proportionally) in the U.S., then there’s no dark conspiracy at work here. We’ve earned this decline on merit.
The WASP influence had waned by the 1960s; there were no “two centuries of dominance”. In fact, many of the government responses to the Great Depression were very “un-WASP” - and Roosevelt himself knew it. He was very concerned about paying people who weren’t working, and the government-funded work programs would be a great idea even today for people “on relief” - especially since many of those CCC, CWA, and WPA projects are now crumbling and require maintenance. It wouldn’t involve new spending, just making welfare recipients earn a living (we’re paying them anyway).