Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Officials Discussed Hold on Ukraine Aid After Trump Spoke With Country’s Leader (BARF ALERT)
NYT ^ | 12/21/19 | Edward Wong

Posted on 12/22/2019 4:10:22 AM PST by SilvieWaldorfMD

WASHINGTON — About 90 minutes after President Trump held a controversial telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine in July, the White House budget office ordered the Pentagon to suspend all military aid that Congress had allocated to Ukraine, according to emails released by the Pentagon late Friday.

A budget official, Michael Duffey, also told the Pentagon to keep quiet about the aid freeze because of the “sensitive nature of the request,” according to a message dated July 25.

An earlier email that Mr. Duffey sent to the Pentagon comptroller suggested that Mr. Trump began asking aides about $250 million in military aid set aside for Ukraine after noticing a June 19 article about it in the Washington Examiner.

The emails add to publicly available information about the events that prompted the Democratic-led House to call for Mr. Trump to be removed from office. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump was impeached for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress along a party-line vote after documents and testimony by senior administration officials revealed that he had withheld $391 million in aid to Ukraine at the same time that he asked for investigations from the Ukrainian president that would benefit him politically.

Sign Up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer A spotlight on the people reshaping our politics. A conversation with voters across the country. And a guiding hand through the endless news cycle, telling you what you really need to know.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: aid; biden; corruption; edwardwong; edwardwongl; frontpagenews; hunterbiden; lisalerer; michaelduffey; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; schiffyism; trump; ukraine; yellowjournalism; zelensky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: SoCal Pubbie

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:52%20section:30121%20edition:prelim)

You can’t accept a thing of value from a foreign power, much less extort it by illegally withholding aid. Trump did a bad, and Mulvaney said as much, and it’s described clearly in the July 25 call transcript. There’s no need to impeach the guy over it, but it’s not nothing.


21 posted on 12/22/2019 5:39:24 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
The 2019 Federal fiscal year ended on September 30th. The government has been operating under a temporary 3-month spending bill that was being negotiated while all this nonsense was going on in September.

If you’re going to come on this site and attack President Trump, you ought to at least have a basic grasp of facts.

22 posted on 12/22/2019 5:43:19 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

How much was this “thing of value” worth?


23 posted on 12/22/2019 5:45:16 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
THE SALIVATING HILLARY GOT TO THE UKRAINE GOLDMINE FIRST
<><> Ukaraine oligarch Pinchuk donated from $10-25 million to the Clinton Foundation between 1994-2005.
<><> Pinchuk hired Clinton pollster Doug Schoen @$40,000 per month in 2000. In 2004, Schoen introduced Pinchuk to Hillary.
<><> Schoen set-up nearly a dozen meetings between Pinchuk and senior State Dept officials between Sept 2011 and Nov 2012.
<><> FOIA Emails show billionaire oligarch Pinchuk invited to dine at Secy of State Hillary's home despite denials they met.

THEN-PRES BILL CLINTON GREASED THE SKIDS Ukraine entered into the "Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters," negotiated by then-President William Clinton and ratified by the U.S. Senate in 2000. The US chief law enforcement officer requested that Ukraine assist our AG in investigating possible criminal activity in 2014 through 2016. Pres Trump is being impeached for following US law initiated by then-Pres Clinton. Perhaps the Clintons do not want their activities with Ukraine exposed?

<><> A 2015 WSJ report includes a chart of “foreign donors” to the Clinton Foundation showing “Ukraine” as a top donor among a list of large donors including “foreign individuals and their foundations and companies" while Clinton was secretary of state from Jan. 21, 2009 to Feb. 1, 2013.

<><> Victor Pinchuk, a former Ukrainian parliamentarian and businessman whose father-in-law is a former president of Ukraine is a connected Ukrainian who served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.is a connected Ukrainian who served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.”

Chelsea Clinton and Viktor Pinchuk in Kiev, Ukraine 8/21/16.

<><> The Clinton Foundation publicly reports, and its foundation spokesman confirmed, that other foreign entities have given more than the Pinchuk Foundation (which is listed as having given between $10 million and $25 million).

<><> Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation based in Kiev, Ukraine, the Journal reported.

<><> In 2008, “Mr. Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative (a wing of the foundation that coordinates charitable projects) "to train future Ukrainian leaders and professionals to modernize Ukraine," according to the Clinton Foundation. <><> Several alumni of the Clinton program are current members of the Ukrainian Parliament.

<><> Ukranian Pinchuk was especially generous---not only blanketing the Clinton Foundation with money, he hired Hillary for a $300,00 speech to help him boost Ukraine's creds; even Chelsea got into the act.

CIRCA 2013----Ukranian billionaire Viktor Pinchuk hires Hillary to give a speech at a Ukraine forum discussing regime change, exiting Russia....and hitting up the US for more foreign aid.

24 posted on 12/22/2019 5:45:56 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

What wording in the July 25 transcript clearly described a benefit to Trump’s campaign in order to trigger a violation of that statute?


25 posted on 12/22/2019 5:48:10 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
You can’t accept a thing of value from a foreign power

You can't ignore Biden's corruption. You can't preclude investigating only because a suspect is a political rival.

26 posted on 12/22/2019 5:50:42 AM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways to Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Well, if there were one single other instance of Trump investigating foreign corruption that might have a bit more credibility. But alas, the only instance that seemed to bother him was the one involving the Dem front-runner.


27 posted on 12/22/2019 5:54:56 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

“You can’t accept a thing of value from a foreign power”

Like naval bases in the Caribbean?

“Much less extort it by withholding aid”

Like destroyers?

Is it too late to impeach FDR?


28 posted on 12/22/2019 5:56:15 AM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

A note from your link Reads:

“Factual & Legal Analysis at 13-20, MUR 6414 (Carnahan) (July 10, 2012) (explaining that a committee’s receipt of investigative or opposition research services without paying the usual or normal charge may result in an in-kind contribution).”

When did Trump’s campaign committee receive such research? When did Trump solicit such research on behalf of his campaign committee? What other actions normally considered part of his duties is a president not allowed to do because it might benefit his re-election? Is it illegal for a president to lobby a foreign power to lower tariffs because that might improve the economy during his term? Would it be collusion if the foreign power did so?


29 posted on 12/22/2019 5:58:55 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

You can’t be serious. The statute I posted related to ELECTIONS, not to wartime alliances. That’s the sort of disingenuous nonsense that really does bug me. I have seen you on here for years, and I know you’re not that stupid.


30 posted on 12/22/2019 5:59:30 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; babble-on

Thanks, Child.

babble-on, must be a highly, HIGHLY principled person.

But, as my neighbor says, as she screws up her face,...”he uses curse words.”

WOW, it appears if you don’t like our president, you just don’t like him.

I LOVE HIM. AND HE DID NOTHING WRONG IF HE HESITATED IN GIVING OUR TAX FUNDS TO A NOTORIOUSLY CORRUPT COUNTRY.
But, I don’t think he even did that.


31 posted on 12/22/2019 6:02:56 AM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

So what,it’s common,nothing to see here,it would be irresponsible for the President to send billions of dollars to a corrupt country without making sure it would not be responsible for the money.
Biden and the Democrats were using Ukraine as a cash machine


32 posted on 12/22/2019 6:05:47 AM PST by ballplayer (By)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

“That’s not what I said. That’s what people said that I said,” Mulvaney said. “Can I see how people took that the wrong way? Absolutely. But I never said there was a quid pro quo, because there isn’t.”

- Mick Mulvaney, October 20, 2019


33 posted on 12/22/2019 6:06:17 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Well, as I have been saying for weeks, this is a coordinated, scripted plan worked out months ago by the President’s enemies, including some Senate Republicans. It is meant to generally follow the Watergate plot map, but of course they have much less to work with.

The two key elements are: First, imply and act as if it’s true that “quid pro quo” in foreign relations is a crime or a wrong act, when it is neither. Bait Trump with the lie and get him to deny the obvious.

Second, assemble “witnesses” who will testify to the quid pro quo, but do not let them appear before the House committees, which would allow weeks for their seemingly convincing but obviously absurd conclusions to be debunked. Instead, withhold their testimony until a Senate trial, where at first they will not be allowed to appear but after an impassioned floor fight and a constant media barrage, four “courageous” Republicans will “stand for the truth” and allow the testimony, (hopefully) triggering a landslide of weak Republicans, who want Trump gone anyway and who, pushed by their “donors” and craving the adulation of the media will remove the President in an afternoon of insanity.

That’s the plan. I hope it fails.

But I wish Trump had followed my advice and mounted a “You’re goddam right I ordered the Code Red” defense from the beginning. The enemies of our nation and our President are going to “prove” that he ordered a quid pro quo to get evidence against Biden, as it was his perfect right, indeed as it was his job to do, and his unfortunate denial may get him removed yet.


34 posted on 12/22/2019 6:10:16 AM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

“not to wartime alliances”

In 1940, when the US sent destroyers to the UK, the US was legally neutral and the UK was a belligerent power.

The US and the UK were not allies at war together.


35 posted on 12/22/2019 6:12:19 AM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“Ten minutes of Hate” to keep the ‘Progressives’ focused.


36 posted on 12/22/2019 6:13:20 AM PST by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Make that MIKE Mulvaney!


37 posted on 12/22/2019 6:19:52 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

All of this horror show amounts in reality to no more significant Constitutionally than fights and charges over what the President had for Breakfast on a Tuesday or whether or not he was offered a mulligan on his own golf course.


38 posted on 12/22/2019 6:20:03 AM PST by arthurus (\\\._V._///___________oo_________________)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

Today’s shameless lie by the NY Times

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor

Just because Biden is now a political opponent does not make him immune from investigation for possible wrong doing while VP. The Democrat party has reckless lied to the US People during this whole impeachment scam. The President has both a legal and a moral obligation to have this investigated. Their “Abuse of power” and “Obstruction of Congress” accusations are absurd lies with not a hint of shred of a clue of either legal, or moral, legitimacy.


39 posted on 12/22/2019 6:21:37 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

All of this hooha is useful as much of the rest of the DemocratMSM handwringing and wailing has been to take the attention off what is being accomplished. It is all good.


40 posted on 12/22/2019 6:21:51 AM PST by arthurus (\\\._V._///___________oo_______00________)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson