Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It will be 257 years before women have equal pay, new report says
NBC "News" ^ | December 17, 2019 | By Sarah Jackson

Posted on 12/18/2019 7:00:02 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Subtitle: The World Economic Forum's report measured the gender gap in 153 countries across politics, economics, health and education.

Women have to wait a while for equal pay, a new report says - roughly until the year 2277.

At the current rate of change, the gender gap in economic participation and opportunity won't close for another 257 years, up from 202 years in last year's estimate, according to the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report, published Tuesday.

The report measured the gender gap across economics, politics, education and health and ranked 153 countries on their closeness to gender equality across those four categories. The time needed to close the gender gap in all four categories went down to 99.5 years for the countries that the report has evaluated every year since its inception in 2006.

Iceland was recognized as the most gender-equal country for the eleventh year in a row. Other Nordic countries - including Norway, Finland and Sweden - and Nicaragua rounded out the top five. Yemen ranked lowest on the list.

The United States fell two spots from last year to rank 53rd on the list, although 101 of the countries assessed increased their scores from last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: men; money; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2019 7:00:02 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Those leap years are a bitch.


2 posted on 12/18/2019 7:02:21 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Doesn’t matter.

Global climate change will have destroyed the Earth long before that!


3 posted on 12/18/2019 7:02:31 AM PST by airborne (I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, in 12 years, according to them, we’re either going to all be gone or living (sustainably) in caves. So, no worries.


4 posted on 12/18/2019 7:03:40 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This report is obviously wrong. It will be 256.14857 years. Or maybe 258.86575 years. No way it’s 257.0. Do they even math? Don’t they know it’s more sciencey if you add decimals?


5 posted on 12/18/2019 7:04:15 AM PST by cdcdawg (Cornpop was a bad dude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well by that time we’re supposed to all be dead from climate change. So I wouldn’t sweat it.


6 posted on 12/18/2019 7:04:25 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Too bad, so sad.


7 posted on 12/18/2019 7:05:02 AM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’ll take “Recycling Disproved Tropes” for $200, Alex!


8 posted on 12/18/2019 7:05:41 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Epstein didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Women have to wait a while for equal pay, a new report says

when enough men become women and vice versa, that problem will dissapear

9 posted on 12/18/2019 7:07:28 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sheesh, that's almost as long as Bernie Sanders has been roaming around on this earth!

10 posted on 12/18/2019 7:08:38 AM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This canard has been thoroughly and indisputably refuted dozens of times.


11 posted on 12/18/2019 7:09:34 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

25 years?

Someone has underestimated the power of pu$$y.


12 posted on 12/18/2019 7:09:40 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How many years until women stop having and raising children?

God bless them for doing so, but family demands interrupt careers, limiting seniority and the the acquisition of work knowledge that then limits pay.


13 posted on 12/18/2019 7:12:56 AM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Women should work longer days and be more valuable to a company. No way a company is going to let a valuable employee go over a few dollars.

Or, they can shut up, build their own business and pay themselves whatever they want.

IT’S a FREE country. At least until January 2021.


14 posted on 12/18/2019 7:18:49 AM PST by Trumplican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Here is an old saying I learned a long time ago...Women control half the money in the world, but all of the pu$$y...


15 posted on 12/18/2019 7:18:59 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

My question.

If women earn less than men, why would any business hire a man?


16 posted on 12/18/2019 7:20:34 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Are they figuring in successful men who identify as women?


17 posted on 12/18/2019 7:20:50 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t even have to wonder how much money the World Economic Forum (WEF, WTF?) spent on this study/report. Automatically, it was a lot.

With the amounts of money spent on psychology, sociology and science-falsely-so-called — in just the past 10 years alone — many true scientific breakthroughs might have been achieved. In reality though, the money saved would have probably been spent on something equally stupid.


18 posted on 12/18/2019 7:21:00 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Women control half the money in the world, but all of the pu$$y..>>>>>>

Agreed

And as has been said on the big screen:

“Its my dooty to serve that booty.” ( grin)


19 posted on 12/18/2019 7:21:07 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obam_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So there averaging in all working women. Those who’d prefer to stay home with kids.....but economically can’t?

The whole thing is rigged. First they change (or try to change) everything about our society and many women and men are not interested in this Marxist generated brave new world. Then they plug the numbers in based on what they assume is normal.

So friggin bogus the whole thing.


20 posted on 12/18/2019 7:21:32 AM PST by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson