Déjà vu 1968

americanthinker.com ^ | 12/6/2019 | anna l stark

[rktman]

The Democrats are in disarray and a perfect storm of events is brewing once again, almost identical to what happened 52 years ago. The Democrat’s feeble attempt to craft a convincing impeachment narrative drags on, but is dwarfed by a clutter of 2020 Presidential candidates, none whom have majority support. It’s early, but hard to ignore the severe ideological division between the radical socialist revolutionaries competing against the more moderate liberals, the DNC still hampered by deadweight candidates, and everyone anticipating a latecomer surprise candidate added to the mix. One thing is for certain: the DNC convention next July has all the makings of a 1968 redux.

[rktman]

Possibly, less (sadly) the zealous Chicago cops swinging big sticks.

[SunkenCiv]

"Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, hairy legs!"

[gibsonguy]

“severe ideological division”

Wrong. There isn’t 10% difference between any of them. A couple realize you still have to keep part of the mask on.

[blueunicorn6]

You are on a ship in the ocean and it sinks. There is no lifeboat and you don’t have a life jacket.

Your thoughts and efforts are on:
A. Finding the chef and asking him for his recipe for the shrimp.
B. Survival.

The Democrat Party leaders are just trying to survive.

They have made illegal deals with Soros and nations hostile to the US.

Soros and these nations are demanding that these bought Democrat Party leaders obey them or there will be consequences.

These Democrat Party leaders are just treading water with this impeachment baloney.

It needs to be made clear to them that doing the bidding of Soros and these hostile nations will have consequences for them.

Serious consequences.

They need to come to President Trump and confess.

[Yo-Yo]

But look at what the Democratic Party morphed into after the 1968 convention. That was the turning point when the radical left took over the party. When it stopped being the party of Kennedy and started being the party of Alinsky.

[rktman]

Well, there is that. :-)