For the coup plotters and traitors against the President
At last, an intellectually honest man.
“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still........be a doosh.
Will the Lefties be storming this man’s house, harassing his family and attempting to ruin his career and reputation?
One Pro-Trump professor to testify and three anti-Trumpers.
Yeah, that’s fair.
WTF? George Washington University Law School is as over the edge deep state as you can get, one arc minute to the right of Georgetown University Law School. A reasoned argument based upon facts and law from a law professor? Can’t he lose tenure for this? This is worse than a trip to pedo island.
Uh oh.
Now Adam Schiff will need to illegally attain Johnathon Turley’s phone records, too.
Listening to this schmuck Karlan preach to me on why she wants to take away my vote from 2016. I can’t stomach these people. Ugly on the outside and ugly on the inside.
“One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president,” Turley wrote in his opening statement.
...
He’s giving his fellow Trump hating Democrats a way out.
"Impeachment" is a hit-job.
It's the latest attempt by unscrupulous politicians to nullify the 2016 Presidential Election, i.e. to steal the votes of the Americans who elected Donald Trump to the Presidency.
Everybody knows that.
If it’s dangerous then that means the Dems are what they accuse the President of being.
From an earlier Fox News Story:
In the same pillared room that hosted last month's House Intelligence Committee hearings, lawmakers will hear from Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan, Harvard law professor and Bloomberg columnist Noah Feldman, University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley.All are Democrat witnesses except for Turley -- a point that did not escape the notice of the president Tuesday evening.
"They get three constitutional lawyers ... and we get one," Trump said during a bilateral meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in London. "That's not sounding too good, and that's the way it is. We don't get a lawyer, we don't get any witnesses -- we want Biden, we want the son Hunter, where's Hunter? We want Schiff. We want to interview these people. Well, they said no. We can't do it."
I just watched Turley’s opening statement. He concluded with a line from one of my favorite movies, “A Man For All Seasons,” as said by the British actor Paul Scofield in the role of Sir Thomas More (Scofield won the Best Actor Award for his performance). Very powerful.
Easily the most impressive democrat of our time... Turley stands with the Constitution... not with us - not with them... Yes, a good man.
Professor Karlan is now passionately discussing past British impeachment proceedings. Incredible that anyone would offer such irrelevance to an American Congress.
What hasn’t been explained, regarding Obstruction Of Justice, is that all these subpoenas that have been denied, have to be presented to the Justice branch for litigation.
There cannot be Obstruction unless the subpoenas are found to be justified by the third branch, Justice.
What remains is the impression that this is the best the Dems can do.
To wit: “If you can’t convince them, confuse them.”
It is clear that if the passion and obvious hate were not present, these proceedings would end.
What might be instructive with this debate’s conclusion is the better definition of impeachment for the future.
Of course...by the standard being held by the D’s any future POTUS could be impeached over anything. All you’d have to do is make a claim of wrong doing, line up a bunch of people that repeat innuendo, hearsay, make assertions, and frame the narrative for a “made up crime”. One that could be possible if you base impeachment on conspiracy theories. No future POTUS could possibly survive. Of course, this guy realizes it and the D’s are too dumb to see it.
Imagine if Biden actually gets voted in as POTUS. We would be demanding impeachment before he’s sworn in. The only difference is that there’s actual FACTS of wrongdoing.
Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi are trying to disenfranchise 63M US Citizens. This must not stand. What they are doing is incredibly dangerous, akin to playing with Pandora’s Box.
Turley then backed that up with this exactly 3 weeks ago:
"If they want to move forward primarily or exclusively with the Ukraine controversy, it would be the narrowest impeachment in history. Such a slender foundation is a red flag for architects who operate on the accepted 1:10 ratio between the width and height of a structure.The physics is simple. The higher the building, the wider the foundation. There is no higher constitutional structure than the impeachment of a sitting president and, for that reason, an impeachment must have a wide foundation in order to be successful. The Ukraine controversy is not such a foundation, and Democrats continue to build a structurally unsound case that will be lucky to make it to the Senate before collapsing."
Bookmarked!
What I saw yesterday at the Judiciary Hearing:
THREE OUT OF FOUR DEMOCRATS ARE MEAN, NASTY, VINDICTIVE HUMAN BEINGS.